Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It doesn't matter.

The burden of truth is supposed to be on the accuser.

Consider if you will - a robber is caught by police in his own house. In this house, they found the items the robber stole. Should they:

a) take the items the robber stole b) take everything



Thanks to civil asset forfeiture laws, the police will in fact b) take everything.


That's probably covered by criminal forfeiture if the robber is convicted.


In a civil case like the one above, its based on a preponderance of evidence. Are you saying that when one device is fake, I should give the benefit of the doubt and assume no other is?


All the adapters were fake. Not the computers.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: