Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Keep in mind Jack Dorsey the interim CEO, so it's only temporary until they find a permanent CEO.



Jack is a wild card. They'll give him a shot and see how it goes.

If it goes well they can pull an Apple and say, "The founder is finally coming back!" If not they can quietly find a replacement and say, "Now Jack is going back to Square, just like they said he always would."

It's PR insurance, basically, which Twitter desperately needs considering they go through CEOs faster than I go through freelancers.


I don't think he can do that to Square and their investors as nice as the story sounds.


He has ran both companies simultaneously in the past via 16 hour work days: http://thenextweb.com/entrepreneur/2011/11/14/jack-dorsey-do...


Which is insane, and not sustainable.


How do you know? Plenty of people work 16 hour days. Of course, it's not for everyone, but it's tough to say what's sustainable for someone else.


Well, sure. All I know is that if I was an investor in Twitter I would not be happy with it.


Don't believe everything you read.


He wasnt CEO at both though


He'd probably rather run Twitter if forced to choose.


Do what, leave them? Or return to them after this?


Spend any real significant time with split duties. Most of his investors would say "We didn't put $x in this with the understanding that you were going to be a 50% CEO/leader"


Ellen Pao is the interim CEO of Reddit. Interim CEO is still CEO, you still have the power of the job.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: