Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Not being 100% sure which command this will correct to is dangerous.

And yet the concept of the invocation `fuck --dry-run` is surely unappealing. :-)




I don't often laugh at HN comments, but when I do, I do it hard. :)


You get easily aroused.


Created a pull request for a `fuck -dry` option. Did not test nor store the command so when it is ran again it is recalled, but the base is there for it to be fully implemented.


Okay that was hilarious!


/sigh @hackernews turning into your typical reddit thread.


I think dry-run should be the default. Then if you really want to run it without checking the command first you could do:

    fuck --without-condom
or maybe

    fuck --iamfeelinglucky


--bareback?


Ok. The --without-condom needs to be an option.


What if you could fuck with a small D? `fuck -d`




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: