It's not exactly an accounting trick if you do one of the following:

1) Earn most of your income in a foreign country so you pay taxes there instead of the US.

2) Earn most your income from tax exempt bonds.

Anyone can do this. You don't need a fancy accountant. Just either:

1) Move to a foreign country and get a job there.

2) Buy a bunch of tax exempt bonds.

These aren't people with high paying jobs somehow magically not paying taxes on them. So, like I said: "largely a myth".

I reject the premise that anyone can move to a foreign country, select tax exempt bonds and gross at least $200K/year. Maybe you as someone who appears smart and ambitious could pull it off consistently, but that's tough to do.

You seem to be getting hung up on whether there's anything "novel" about a subset of tax avoidance schemes and not mentioning trusts or other tax schemes disproportionately used by wealthy individuals such as offsetting income with high medical costs or moving assets to lower-tax jurisdictions.

FWIW, the IRS study in the article referenced breaks down these expenses for folks without worldwide income.

I certainly agree that moving to a foreign country and getting a good job there is hard. Further I agree that buying bonds that gross 200K a year in interest is expensive (though it's not hard to select them). However neither of those things constitute "accounting games." They are extremely straightforward aspects of the tax code available to anyone.

They also won't actually save you any money. With the former you'll just be paying taxes to a foreign government instead. With the latter you'll get a lower rate of return than you would for buying other bonds.

I didn't mention "trusts or other tax schemes" because the Forbes article you linked to didn't mention them. It didn't mention them because those aren't actually ways to get out of paying taxes. That is, as I said upthread, largely a myth.

You bring up medical costs so I'll touch on those as well. People don't get sick or injured and pay lots of money for medical treatment to avoid paying taxes. Certainly one can debate whether such expenses should result in a tax reduction but we, as a country, have currently decided that they have in most cases. Again this doesn't constitute "accounting games." They are, again, very straightforward deductions available to all. Keep in mind though that you do have to spend the money on medical care instead of taxes though. So you won't have saved any actual money to spend out a house or a new iPad or whatever.

OK. I didn't realize you were being nuanced about the definition of "accounting games" and its connotations. I agree that these tactics are straight forward.

It's not nuance. it's just being straightforward. A lot of people (including the person that started this thread) seem to think that the "super-wealthy" can play "accounting games" to avoid paying taxes in a way that is somehow mysterious, nefarious or unavailable to everyone.

In reality, things are actually fairly straight forward when it comes to our taxes and most of the time if you're earning money you're paying taxes. If you aren't, it's generally for a pretty good reason.