Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

  > I was able to argue back without resorting to name calling.
  And so was I. What's your point?
You use words like "naiveté", "delusion", "meaningless" which are clearly derogatory so you are wrong again.

Hilariously your comment "all the comments I've seen thus far are civil" completely rung true until you got involved.




Then perhaps we misunderstand each other. I used those terms to describe (accurately, in my opinion) your opinions, they have nothing to do with you as a person.


Nonsense. The things you say about a persons opinions are still things you say against that person. It just becomes more acceptable in some circles to describe someone as having naive opinions than describing the person as naive.

The best course of action is to leave the emotive language out of the discussion.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: