Can we stop the negativity toward the forensic expert here? He's doing his job. Trying to find out fake pictures. If you disagree, just give a counter point. Stop the Ad-hominem.
Here are my counter-arguments:
1. Blood gets very dry: Not necessarily. Blood requires a sufficient level of platelets to get dry quickly. This can be the case, and it's not a rare condition. (I have it and my nose bleed frequently).
2. Blood color: Same argument. Depend on the constituents of the blood; and whether it's oxygenated or not.
3. Look at her right eye-brow. It looks like she was hit there and blood was bleeding from that place all over her right face. It can be the source of fresh, red blood.
Without casting any aspersions on the veracity of the photo, being talked about, it has to be said that there was plenty of amateur footage making the rounds in the early stages of the conflict, right about the time the UK parliament put the commitment of British forces in a potential military involvement, to vote.
The integrity of photos and video evidence (filmed mostly by amateurs in the early stages of the military strikes by Syrian security forces) was disputed.
Here are my counter-arguments:
1. Blood gets very dry: Not necessarily. Blood requires a sufficient level of platelets to get dry quickly. This can be the case, and it's not a rare condition. (I have it and my nose bleed frequently).
2. Blood color: Same argument. Depend on the constituents of the blood; and whether it's oxygenated or not.
3. Look at her right eye-brow. It looks like she was hit there and blood was bleeding from that place all over her right face. It can be the source of fresh, red blood.