Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's mostly about the fact that the author makes somewhat serious accusations while his proof is rather underwhelming.


Also he has a history of making strong claims that are disproved by other experts.

See: http://petapixel.com/2013/05/14/forensics-expert-claims-worl...


Wow. He seems like an all-around shithead especially considering the fact that he's been proven wrong before yet that does not prevent him prevent him from doing the same thing again.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: