Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> "I currently don't have any internet service and just €15 in my wallet - I can't withdraw any money from the ATM," she added.

from: https://news.sky.com/story/large-parts-of-spain-and-portugal...

This is literally the whistleblowers about cashless society have been warning everyone about for well over a decade now.




> whistleblowers

Using the term whistleblower in this manner is inappropriate; actual whistleblowers are individuals who bring to light illicit acts by organizations or governments at great personal risk.


Prophets


Peters


I'm a dummy, but I don't get it :) can you explain?


> This is literally the whistleblowers about cashless society have been warning everyone about for well over a decade now.

This is how humans are with all catastrophes–there isn't enough money until after something really, really bad happens and suddenly there is enough money to fix the issue.

NYC is extremely vulnerable to a 9/11 style attack on the fresh water aquaducts. Fuller wrote about this all the way back in the 60s in Operating Manual For Spaceship Earth:

Thus under lethal emergencies vast new magnitudes of wealth come mysteriously into effective operation. We don’t seem to be able to afford to do peacefully the logical things we say we ought to be doing to forestall warring-by producing enough to satisfy all the world needs. Under pressure we always find that we can afford to wage the wars brought about by the vital struggle of "have-nots" to share or take over the bounty of the "haves." Simply because it had seemed, theretofore, to cost too much to provide vital support of those "have- nots." The "haves" are thus forced in self-defense suddenly to articulate and realize productive wealth capabilities worth many times the amounts of monetary units they had known themselves to possess and, far more importantly, many times what it would have cost to give adequate economic support to the particular "have-nots" involved in the warring and, in fact, to all the world’s ’have-nots."


> This is literally the whistleblowers about cashless society have been warning everyone about for well over a decade now.

Indeed but it stands to reason that this outage will last maybe a few hours until the grid has recovered. A nationwide full blackout is a scenario that's on a "once a quarter century" level, and the last one in 2006 was resolved after two hours. It's Europe, not the US - our grids operate on much, much stricter requirements and audits on resiliency, hell since last year we got an active warzone in the ENTSO-E grid and it hasn't been too much of an issue!

Not much of value will have been lost in the meantime. The only ones who are truly and beyond screwed by such events are large smelters and similar factories where any prolonged downtime leads to solidification of the products which, in extreme cases, require a full reconstruction.

As for "I can't buy eggs in a supermarket now"... lol. People need to learn to chill down a bit. You won't die from having to wait a few hours to be able to buy the eggs.


> Not much of value will have been lost in the meantime. The only ones who are truly and beyond screwed by such events are large smelters and similar factories where any prolonged downtime leads to solidification of the products which, in extreme cases, require a full reconstruction.

I think you've left out a few things, I remember doing on site work at a pharma company that required some downtime on one of their lines and if we went over the allotted time, they would be charging us up to 2 million EUR an hour. Hospitals and critical services SHOULD have backup generators etc, but depending how long this lasts a lot of things can become a major problem.

The majority of the cases will be fine, but when there's mass confusion and interruption like this, there's always horrible stories that come out.


most generators in european cities are connected to gas utility so it has essentially unlimited capacity without land traffic.

edit: and europe has almmost always atleast half a year of whole country supply of natural gas in caverns and other storage.


> our grids operate on much, much stricter requirements and audits on resiliency,

None of that changes the difficulty of a black start. If there is a full outage, it will take a while to get going.


> None of that changes the difficulty of a black start.

That's the beauty of the European grid: it is not a black start event for Spain, at least as long as even a single link to any of the neighbouring countries is available.


The difficulty is still the same: for each piece of the puzzle (substations, high voltage power lines, transformers, generators, loads), they have to wait until enough power is available at the connection point, and carefully manage the power balance so it's neither too much nor too little (and if they get it wrong, things trip offline and they have to start all over), while the grid is in a degraded state (often meaning no alternative paths, so a single fault can set them back several steps). The only difference being that the black start "generators" are these still working international links (which could be very far from the important parts of the national grid).

It might be faster to instead black start several independent power islands in parallel, and connect them together as a final step. At least in my country (Brazil), that's how it's done for large-scale blackouts, even when some of the country still has power; it was done that way for the partial blackout in 2023, and there's a written procedure on how to do it (which is available on the operator website, if you know where to look). In 2023, some areas failed to black start for one reason or another, and had to wait for power from the outside; other areas managed to black start as expected, and were then synchronized with other areas until everything came back together.


Yes

But honestly dark starts are the kind of boomer self-made problems that'll just have to work around

Whoever built a solar grid inverter without the capacity for dark start needs a stern talking to


The grid is not just an aggregation of individual sources and sinks; it takes active effort to keep them all working together in a useful way without just collapsing again into another cascading failure. For that reason, your solar inverter doesn't come on until the grid operator wants the solar inverters to come on in your section of the grid.

It's tempting to think of the grid as something grid operators control, feeding power from point A to point B, but the grid is actually largely uncontrolled - the power just flows wherever it wants to - and the only controls they have are turning on and off generators, adjusting their throttle, disconnecting loads (rolling blackouts) and sometimes opening circuit breakers (though this is not normally useful). They don't even have precise real-time monitoring of the whole grid - only specific measurements in specific locations, from which the rest is estimated using lots of maths (which is how you would design it too, if measurement devices cost $100,000 apiece). That's why it's not a trivial task to keep it working.

However, you're able to have your own, private miniature grid, on which you can power your own loads from your own generators. It's even possible to do this with solar inverters! You will need to specifically seek out this capability, and get extra hardware installed, which is probably why you don't have it. You need a "transfer switch" to definitively disconnect your private grid from the main grid when you're using your private grid capability - it's not allowed (and not safe, and will blow up your equipment anyway if you force it) to just feed power onto your local unpowered section of the grid.


I knew some of this, but thanks for explaining it well

And while there are ways to maintain inertia https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/solar/grid-inertia-why-... I don't see why a solar farm can't do it through smart syncing of inverters (or maybe they do some measure of it)


Solar inverters could simulate inertia by not running at 100% most of the time, but you do want the free energy machines to run at 100% as much as they physically can, because it's free energy, which means there's no buffer for simulating inertia. It's been commented many times that batteries can be used to simulate inertia. You can also literally just add inertia, in heavy spinning lumps of metal that don't do anything.


As in the German government and most of the political class...


Germany has dozens of links to its neighbours. We don't need much in terms of "black start" capacity, that's just pointless fearmongering by fossil fuel and/or prepper propaganda sites.

As long as even a single link to any of our neighbours is up and running, it can be used to start the rest of the grid - which is exactly what was done in the 2006 outage and why that one took barely two hours to be resolved. The only truly screwed country at the moment is Portugal because all their grid links run through Spain.


As long as we’re throwing shade at EU vs US, I can’t remember the last time the US had a nationwide blackout, certainly not in my lifetime!


> As long as we’re throwing shade at EU vs US, I can’t remember the last time the US had a nationwide blackout, certainly not in my lifetime!

Talking about "national" in the sense Spain (pop. 48M, 506,030 km²) is roughly equivalent to a few US states. A similarly (population/area) sized outage occurred a couple of decades ago:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_blackout_of_2003

North America is organized in regional grids:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_power_transmiss...


US nationwide would be the whole of Europe category, which, I don't believe had ever happened.

Texas, on the other hand, which is easily the size of a country...


Just verified: Texas is larger than Spain and Portugal combined!


Indeed, and that’s the main problem: you can’t remember or know anything.

It’s is a known fact that in general the US power grid is orders of magnitude less reliable than in Europe. And the excuse of “the weather is more extreme” is just that: a lame excuse.

Just count the number of American households that have generators and/or batteries vs the Europeans if you really have an honest desire to know anything about anything.


The US has three “independent” grids so losing them all would be hard. But I believe at times Texas has gotten close, and East went pretty dark at some point recently.

CA of course has rolling blackouts for other reasons.


2021 was pretty bad in Texas, IIRC


2021 would have been a non-event if people in Texas weren't propagandized about some nonsensical "Independence" bullshit.

A few more interconnects with the rest of the country and it wouldn't have even made the news.

this is after decades of Texans bragging about their independent power supply. Many Texans still believe outright lies about the blackout, like it being "caused" by green energy sources, which was false.

It was caused by free market participants not spending capital to harden their network. Solar panels and Wind Turbines work great in the cold climate of Canada.

The storm that caused such a problem is a once every ten years storm. The grid companies all should have foreseen this with even minimal investment in planning. They didn't, because that's less profitable, and the "regulator" in Texas has no ability to punish them for pinching pennies on reliability and resilience.

Free Market at work baby!


>> The storm that caused such a problem is a once every ten years storm.

This is incorrect. That storm set multiple records, most notably the longest freezing streak the state has ever experienced [1]

Houston, San Antonio, Austin and Waco hit 30 year lows while Dallas set 80 year lows.

It also hit the entire state at the same time.

Maybe there's validity to some of the rest of your post, but that storm was absolutely not a regular occurance.

1. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/streaks/mapping/...


There's five different grids in North America (Eastern, Western, Texas, Alaska, Quebec) so something would have to go very wrong for a nationwide blackout.


Except this is Spain and Portugal which combined have 1/3 of the area of Texas, which had a state wide outage recently.


There was a very famous one in 2003.

As was pointed out, the USA has three independent grids (east, west, and Texas) and EU countries are roughly comparable to states (except with less federal power). The equivalent of a European nationwide blackout would be a US statewide blackout, and those HAVE happened, definitely within your lifetime if you're old enough to use Hacker News, mostly in Texas.


It was about 7 hours long: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_blackout_of_2003. Where I lived it was restored very quickly.

I had a long blackout as a kid during a hurricane in 1985. Once it was safe it was repaired rather quickly.


US, no, Texas and California are .. not doing so well.


There isn’t much you can buy with cash either if there is no electricity.


I wonder if stores would be able to sell anything without power. My supermarket, for example, only has electronic cash registers. And no price tags.


I was on a plane during the Northeast Blackout of 2003. Landed, got in my car, and attempted to leave the parking garage but with no power the automated EZ-Pass payment wasn't working nor were the credit card machines. Most people, myself included, had neither sufficient cash nor a checkbook on hand. Huge logjam of cars. The workers ended up getting the old school handheld metal credit card machines that created an imprint of the credit card on carbon paper from some long forgotten storeroom and using them.


Many years ago I worked in a Safeway grocery store. We would have occasional power failures that would leave the entire store dark; we would all be given flashlights to help customers find their way out.

The cash registers, though, had backup power, so the store could still take their money.


I worked as a cashier at a large UK supermarket when I was a student. In our training we were told that if there was an outage with the cash registers we should ask shoppers to estimate how much their groceries cost and accept what they told us. Payment could be by cash or cheque.

Apparently when this had been done in the past shoppers were generally honest & relatively accurate.


Many situations call for pen-and-paper backups. Giving out receipts the old way should, in theory, be a possibility, then backfill the computer system later.


Sure, but if we are talking about backup in outages you can also get credit card payments when power is down using something like a Stripe Terminal.

This is actually exactly the case that I had in one trip to Andorra: the power was down for 2 hours while we were choosing equipament for skiing. The shop had no issues getting our orders done though, because they just manually filled the orders with pen-and-paper and did the payment with a credit card terminal connected to a smartphone.


If your building has a power outage, that works.

If your city has an extended power outage, the cell nets could easily be down as well.


In my experience, for the 4G/5G network to be down something really serious must be happening. I had long power outages (more than a few hours, in some cases even days) that affected multiple regions in places that I lived before that still had working cell network. I assume cell networks have backup power and preferential usage of the power grid, but I am not a specialist.

And I am not saying that you shouldn't accept money as backup, of course you should. But what I am saying is that you can still accept credit cards even during most power outages.

Same as Software Engineer, it is impossible to have perfect, 100% reliability, but it doesn't mean we can't improve from 99% to 99.9%, for example, to have a better service.


Used to work for a telco. Cell sites have battery backup. Some have generators. Any fibre repeaters also will, as do any radio based backhaul sites. The HLR/core network etc will run indefinitely due to generators & strict fuel supply contracts for said generators.


If a city has an extended power outage such that the battery backed cell network goes down, then everything else will be failing too and payments are the least of your problems.

Without electricity the water system depressurized, which contaminates it. After about a week the sewage pumping stations have backed up so the sewer system is starting to fail.

Modern cities cannot operate without electrical power given their scale and density.

It is bizarre to think the biggest problem is "how do we keep a transaction of value?"

Like, just declare an emergency and let business owners be reimbursed by the government.


Credit card processing existed before widespread telecommunications infrastructure. Maybe we should require payment cards to have raised numbers like they used to so the old carbon copy machines continue to work.

Credit cards and payment networks have always explicitly supported "Offline" processing like that.

The kind of fraud that system enables isn't really common.


In Lisbon's airport they are temporarily back to just stamping the passports without the biometric stuff. There are already reports that the checks are being lax.


I was in a Tesco when there was a power outage - the self checkouts all died (and rebooted into a custon Debian based OS with a Chromium front end by the looks of it), but the staffed tills still worked and could accept Chip+PIN but not contactless.


> My supermarket, for example, only has electronic cash registers. And no price tags.

I know someone who works at a supermarket, and (some of?) their point of sale (POS) systems have a small UPS that can run for a couple of hours to ride through smaller outages.


I used to install those systems, and it's a couple minutes at best, if they've replaced the batteries recently, which they never have. It'll give them time to finish the transaction they're in the middle of ringing, then shut down cleanly, because the server in the back room _should_ have a bit more battery to keep the database consistent.

PoS systems aren't particularly power-hungry, but store owners never want to spend an extra cent, so they go with the smallest UPS they can manage. (And arguably if they went with a big overkill UPS, its after-outage recharging power would be larger so you'd be able to put fewer registers on a single circuit, so it's not as simple as just dropping in a bigger UPS.)


It's not just stores, pretty much our entire socity runs on cheap power, without it the whole thing falls apart.


Our global society runs on a lot of cheap sources of necessary inputs. Power is just one of them.


Very good point that nowadays many stores rely on barcodes and product IDs to get prices, and don't label individual items... So even pen and paper to keep track of takings is no use since they can't even figure out prices if the system is down!


Valid point, but there must be a price at the location of the item in the store.


> My supermarket, for example, only has electronic cash registers.

That's insane to me, in the EU anyway it's not permitted to only accept electronic payments..

> Retailers cannot refuse cash payments unless both parties have agreed to use a different means of payment. Displaying a label or posters indicating that the retailer refuses payments in cash, or payments made in certain banknote denominations, is not enough.


>That's insane to me, in the EU anyway it's not permitted to only accept electronic payments..

That's not the case. There are individual laws in each country that govern this.

https://fullfact.org/online/UK-not-only-europe-country-legal...


I guess I was taking the recommendation as a regulation, my mistake.

Either way, there should be no reason grocery stores don't accept cash imo.

https://www.ecb.europa.eu/euro/cash_strategy/faqs/html/index...


They have to accept cash in the US as well. The post you're replying to is just saying that they can't ring anything up or accept any payment without power.


> They have to accept cash in the US as well.

Only in a handful of cities and states. There is no federal law requiring businesses to accept cash for goods and services.


Ah okay, that wasn't clear to me, I imagined only being able to use electronic payment types.

But in this case, an emergency, I would assume someone would still know how to take a manual payment receipt!


And this is a trial for how a Carrington event will look like.


I just look to Gaza strip as an example how society continues operating under extreme adversity from the western powers, incl. total lack of electricity distribution for more than a year and a half and full blockade of water, food, and medicine.

No need for imaginary scenarios.



You mean the part that anything above 130nm technology would be fried?


I don't think this is true, and I would like to see an explanation of how it might be that quantifies the effect: are we talking electric field strength or magnetic field strength? Modern parts are generally better at ESD than old ones, as well.


Why 130nm?


Yes. For the moment I just want to see for how long the AWS Spain Region will stay up...


Unless this extends to many days, the diesel generators will cover this easily.


most datacenters do not use diesel, but gas/methane/natural gas - utility connection, that way you do not need to truck/store anything.

and so being located in middle of city you do not want ten of thousands of liters of diesel in tanks there.

same applies for luxury high rises in europe, almost all if not all of 20+ story buildings built last 30 years have them on roofs.


> and so being located in middle of city you do not want ten of thousands of liters of diesel in tanks there.

Why? Every gas station stores that capacity.


gas stations, at least in europe, have "safety zone" around them.

also depends on data center, some datacenters are directly in middle of european city. in most dense part of city and dense in europe or asia is something else then dense in america.


This isn’t true in the US and would be a huge dependency risk. Natural gas networks require electricity to operate.

> and so being located in middle of city you do not want ten of thousands of liters of diesel in tanks there.

This is based on FUD. This is the case all over the US and they don’t cause problems.

It’s interesting that Europe has taken such a brittle approach to infrastructure.


Another reason why itcoin is a pipedream too, particularly for third world countries


If an ATM is down, it's down. With Bitcoin you can still use mesh networks. Here's an old article about an example: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/samourai-and-gotenna-ena...

(Samurai wallet is defunct, but the principle holds up)


I agree that bitcoin is a poor solution for anyone but a small elite. But as long as you have the mobile network on diesel generators (which you do in countries where power cuts happen regularly), something like M-PESA still works.


You can have physical bitcoins - devices that hold a private key in a tamper free way. The private key holds a fixed amount of BTC


Without power or an internet connection you can't validate that the btc hash is unspent, avoid double spends, or validate that your taking ownership of it made it to the blockchain and was confirmed for a few blocks.

Sure you can transfer the private key from one device to another, but (a) you can't know the other person didn't retain a copy of it and (b) you would be limited to spending the exact amount you have in an existing transaction because you couldn't send a transaction to the chain that splits it.


You've to got a reputation system with identities also stored on the blockchain, and you accept the transactions only from the most trustworthy people. Counterfeit paper currency exists, and counterfeit bitcoin (not BTC) transactions might exist, but not every person is equally suspect of using counterfeit money.


Sure, but then you aren't really using bitcoin. The whole point of bitcoin was to be a trust less system where transactions are verified cryptographically on the blockchain.

Transacting bitcoin private keys without going to the network and trusting the other party to not scam you defeats the whole purpose.


If anything, it shows how little use there is for physical cash , only as emergency backup


"emergency backup" is a very strong, rational use, and should never be neglected.


You can use cash but it mostly does not work in case of big chains or stores. They need to have access to their SAP/ERP software...It is not about payment for a long time.


Running a generator to power a point of sale machine and maybe an offsite server is a lot easier than generators to power the whole electronic payment chain.


Cash is not really relevant to this particular discussion.

When the power is out one cannot pay with cash either - because the cash register is offline.


Let me introduce you to the physical receipt block which is made of paper and can be filled up with a pen, and what is still often used in, for example, Christmas markets.


Depending on the country it’s not that easy. Maybe something changed in the meantime but where I am those blocks are prefilled-numbered and stock needs to be controlled.

It’s not like you can (could?) keep a block „just in case” and thus many shopkeepers wouldn’t even bother in case of outages.

Depending where you live a good old trust can be a currency. Humans are great when it comes to adaptation, I bet I could just write on paper name, CC number and leave it on a paper for shopkeeper and everything would resolve just fine..


I hear you, and in my second job 20+ years ago we were still trained (in a cursory fashion) to use physical charge slips in case of a POS system network outage, a full power outage would strain my imagination for ability to transact business at the majority of stores other than small mom and pop operations, and tbh even if such an outage had happened to me in 2005, I would not expect my department store to remain open and conduct sales.

Most retail workers are GenZ and struggle to understand what this would even look like because they’ve never conducted any transaction without POS computers (for looking up prices, for tallying them, for figuring tax and total, and computing change), so even if a dusty manual in the stockroom technically spells out a method of ringing sales using nothing but pen and paper and maybe a solar calculator, I would be surprised if any of the clerks working any given day would have the initiative to initiate an offline protocol. Most likely the store manager would usher customers out, lock up the store, keep the staff for 30 minutes to see if it came back on, and then go home.


How do you open the cash register for change when power is out?


> How do you open the cash register for change when power is out?

I've only seen a few but I believe they have springs on the inside and roll on little wheels similar to how desk draws roll. Most can be opened with a key to trigger that event.


With the physical key, everything doesn't need to be electronic you know


Many countries require receipts to be sent to the tax services instantly. In many cases a long enough power cut (days) would render all transactions illegal

(And in many cases you cannot legally pay large amounts of money in cash, it has to be electronic)


Which countries exactly? I've traveled in UK and France and in both countries when the online cash register was down, they opened their physical ledger, made an entry and gave me a physical handwritten paper receipt written with pen and ink. They said they would make enter the same data online when the online cash register comes back up.


I believe this is France (NF525), but I don't think it says "instantly".


My understanding is that this (NF525) only applies to computerised cash registers (software must be certified NF525 compliant), which there is no obligation to use in the first place.

So it is perfectly legal to use pen and paper and a cash box.


Most governments are not as stupid as the anti-government wingnuts would have you believe. They will not prosecute you for taking transactions non-electronically during a power outage.


I'm sure they'd make an exception.


How can this even be a legal requirement?


In some countries whenever you print a receipt, a copy is also sent to the IRS equivalent of that country. Obviously there are events where that can't happen due to technical reasons outside of the store's control.


Which countries? And, again, I doubt that this is the full picture because there are many cases where people simply don't "print a receipt" perfectly legally...


Germany for example mandates printing a receipt. The receipt must be stored in a certified storage inside the cash register and is signed cryptographically, including the hash of the previous receipt such that there is a hash-chain of printed receipts. Therefore each printed receipt that the customer takes home (and maybe at some point hands in to the tax office for some reason) can be used to check the integrity of the cash register storage and all prior receipts in the chain.

https://www.lexware.de/wissen/buchhaltung-finanzen/neue-rege... https://www.lexware.de/wissen/buchhaltung-finanzen/kassenbon...

Many other EU countries have similar regulations, and in some cases had them for a long time.


Same in Portugal. Sync with the tax authority can be immediate or deferred (every x days). Obviously, you can still invoice manually using a receipt book, in case of failure or unavailability of software systems.


Thanks! European red tape madness strikes again... At least in France cash registers are not mandatory (for now...) so there is a way around this madness.


This is a bit more than just red tape madness, it's a strategy to make businesses more transparent. This is about trying to reduce non-reported transactions and too many people dodging their reporting. Even if the rules for cash registries and reporting are detailed, a) that's not really expensive for businesses - it's easy to automate and there are quite a number of competitors; b) compared to accounting and tax rules, they are dead simple.

Receipts or invoices are the basis for a firm's whole economic activity, including the underpinning of their financial reporting, their tax burdens etc. And businesses failing to provide receipts erodes not only the tax base, but also any rights a consumer may have.


The thing with red tape madness is that it is always perfectly justified.


Its actually less red tape. Getting a second copy of a given invoice is trivial, processing of invoices for tax rebates is also mostly automatic (such as health and education expenses); tax invoicing uses well-defined formats, so its trivial to migrate between systems, and perform all kinds of analysis. Also, it increases transparency - you know that eg. the VAT you're paying is not ending in the vendor's pockets.


What red tape madness are you even talking about?


Force majeure should apply.


Source?


Despite the EU having a directive to not make electronic invoicing mandatory, they now allow exceptions that introduce mandatory online invoicing. For example greece romania italy: https://sovos.com/blog/vat/greece-mandatory-b2b-e-invoicing-...


In Italy it doesn't have to be in real time. It's a once a month thing!


Store owners just make out paper receipts in this case, like businesses used to do back in the day


The gas station I worked at used a paper bag when offline. Good, not great.


How did the pumps work when there was no power?


No power is different than no internet, so that was different. We were a 24/7 store (7-Eleven) and sometimes we would close if it was a prolonged power outage. No one has 100% uptime, not even 24 hour gas stations.


They used to have a crank!


please be more respectful to the manager of that establishment!


He said "offline" not "no power".

Also, fuel station can probably successfully run it's own backup power;)


They don’t, at least not here in the US. In areas with power outages, gasoline stations do not operate.


A cash register is not required to make cash transactions


Why would an employee tracking device be necessary to make transactions? It is just people without a cash position performing mental gymnastics in an attempt to justify it, by trying to bring it down to the level of electronic payment methods they convince themselves that, in a similar event, they would be no better off with cash, when in fact they almost certainly would. A merchant who refuses cash on account of a disabled cash register, under these circumstances, is not a serious one, since to do so would be to refuse all business. Those merchants who are so encumbered by scale and bureaucracy that they would be completely incapacitated should be circumvented.


Cashier scribbles furiously to add to cash register later


> When the power is out one cannot pay with cash either - because the cash register is offline.

Cash registers can be connected to small UPSes to ride through smaller outages. You wouldn't need a larger battery if all you want to do is ride through a few-hour outage, or even a whole business day (8-12 hours?).




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: