Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Hey there 60% of the Politburo and a massive portion of Chinese conglomerates.

You want your oil payments processed (done in UAE) [0], your international shipping payments processed (done in UAE) [1], and your OBOR investments across Africa, Central Asia, and South Asia untouched (the UAE is the largest FDI player in all those countries and China often co-invests with the UAE due to a limited presence in those regions) [2], don't mess with us.

By the way, it would be a might shame if all 400,000 Overseas Chinese in the UAE from prostitues in Marina to oligarchs in the Palm Jumeirah were deported due to an act of cyberwar and $107 Billion in UAE-China trade ground to a halt.

Saudi Arabia did a similar thing to Pakistan from 2017-2020 in relation for Imran Khan's support of Qatar. 40,000 Pakistanis were deported near overnight, forced a $1 Billion loan repayment, began investing in Indian Kashmir, and supported the Pakistani Army's de facto coup against Khan in 2022 [3].

Now the Saudi-Pakistan relationship is a different power differential than UAE-China, but China is more dependent on the UAE than the UAE is on China, especially as they are one of the primary players in the Indian, Indonesian, Bangladeshi, Pakistani, Egyptian, Iranian, Russian, and Vietnamese economies, and can make China's life hell in Central+South Asia, Middle East, and Africa.

[0] - https://new.thecradle.co/articles/the-first-china-uae-gas-de...

[1] - https://carnegieendowment.org/sada/85676

[2] - https://www.china-briefing.com/news/china-united-arab-emirat...

[3] - https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/imran-khan-fall-could-pus...




I will give you that it would be a huge hassle for the likes of China and my fake citation was obviously tongue in cheek. But maybe the dependency goes a bit more both ways and while China et al. might not want to go through with such actions, neither the UAE wants to stir the water to much, especially if they are up against giants. That is my guess, at least.


> my fake citation was obviously tongue in cheek

I didn't realize that. There have been a lot of idiots in HN who have written comments like your unironically, so I've become much more combative to misinformation




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: