Fair enough. But don't ISPs and other commercial entities tend to share that stuff "voluntarily" already?
> you could go and read the bill if you want
I like the part about "the term ‘Internet’ has the same meaning given that term in section 230(f) of the Communications Act of 1934."
It says "the term ‘commercial provider’ means a provider of electronic communication service that offers Internet access capability for a fee to the public or to such classes of users as to be effectively available to the public, regardless of the facilities used"
Why wouldn't that apply to a coffee shop that offered free Wifi?
Wouldn't they then be required to collect and retain information which "enables the identification of the corresponding customer"?
Are coffee shops and libraries going to have to check photo IDs like Iran and China?
Fair enough. But don't ISPs and other commercial entities tend to share that stuff "voluntarily" already?
> you could go and read the bill if you want
I like the part about "the term ‘Internet’ has the same meaning given that term in section 230(f) of the Communications Act of 1934."
It says "the term ‘commercial provider’ means a provider of electronic communication service that offers Internet access capability for a fee to the public or to such classes of users as to be effectively available to the public, regardless of the facilities used"
Why wouldn't that apply to a coffee shop that offered free Wifi?
Wouldn't they then be required to collect and retain information which "enables the identification of the corresponding customer"?
Are coffee shops and libraries going to have to check photo IDs like Iran and China?