To summarize: Song goes boom boom in a nice rhythm. And i like good boom booms.

One day you’ll hear a song, say you like it and learned something from it, and then learned it was from an AI.

+1.

Also people way underrate how little there has always been in any form of art that wasn't simply copy-pasting or data-driven and that includes most of the content we consume, but especially modern tv/movies/music.

Which is why I literally ignore 99.99% of what comes down the shit pipes.

I have no social network besides this and occasionally LinkedIn (which is a circus, I don't know how popular reddit here is but holy look at the content people you know write on /r/LinkedInLunatics) and it's good. It even came to most media, I don't like it. It's all exaggerated. The biggest stars in all sports rising at such peaks is so many fields just in those very years, it's all exaggerated. It even comes to what people are aroused from , but it's getting worse and worse and exaggerated and all the way we consume we eventually give data to what they will produce to distract us all. Music, sports, porn, politics, news, it feels like tension boiling and we vote also with what we click and care for.

Peace.

If you say. But I doubt it. Now, could this happen to others - yes, completely plausible.

Keep an eye out for ai songs about humility then!

What will you do after its too difficult to tell how it was created on the surface level? Vet all media that comes into your life?

"Vet all media that comes into your life?"

I already do.

Given a piece of contemporary art, will you be able to tell whether it was created by a human or an AI process? What if your in a gallery looking at collection, but the artist is pseudo-anonymous and no one really knows what tools they use behind the scenes to create their work? Would you allow their work to move you?

At that point it's no different than, say, graffiti. Can only be of so much artistic value, and certainly not worth more than a glance.