Thank you. This is exactly what we are trying to do. It is difficult for us to get rid of the mad scientist label.
We have a team in fact that evaluate the FDA requirement and looking at what would be the best way to do it.
Also, Open IP means for us that we will share the modified strains which are optimized for the expression of the insulin, and ideally, we will be able to provide scientific knowledge and resources to help the creation of local manufacturing plant.
Off topic question: Is there a database maintained by BioHackers that has reverse engineered some or all of the prescription pharmaceuticals, showing not only the compounds used, but how to make, measure and test them? There are government sites that list all the chemical compounds, but details are scattered all over the place on how to make, measure and test them. Asking as a prepper that wants to stock up on food, water and medications. Doubling or tripling BP prescriptions is insufficient by my standards.
The four thieves vinegar is doing something like that (https://fourthievesvinegar.org/)
They work also on patented molecules and try to reverse engineer proces, and then publish it. (which makes it illegal, so they are anonymous)
I don't know how many molecules they published though.
IANAL, but reverse engineering process is almost certainly not illegal. Don't know where you got that idea.
If they cribbing off a "process patent" then it's not reverse engineering, though, IIRC, for most drugs companies don't bother getting a process patent because they are very difficult to enforce (to enforce such a patent, you need a warrant to go onto a competitor's premises and inspect their process, and judges are very very unlikely to issue such a warrant because if they set a low bar precedent for such actions, then basically everyone is going to start issuing spurious claims), so everyone would rather just build their moat with trade secrets than process patents. Also, I believe if you crib off of a process patent to do a one-off run or research project it is not illegal, only commercializing it is. One (ostensible) point of patents is to encourage sharing and desiloing knowledge and keep things out of the dark so that we can learn from each other.
I will admit, I am no patent expert. To my knowledge, you can patent the process, the molecule, the use of the molecule. I don't know exactly why they are all anonymous on 4 thieves vinegar, I assume it was because of patent stuff. It might be for other reasons. I would believe that showing instruction to produce a patented molecule would be an issue. (maybe not, I don't know)
For insulin, I can assure you that there are patent for processes. Quite annoying.
Ah yes I think I've seen that site posted here before. Last I checked they didn't have a big database, but maybe I didn't dig deep enough into the site. The Download the Apothecary MicroLab Plans go to a status page that says to check back later.
We have a team in fact that evaluate the FDA requirement and looking at what would be the best way to do it.
Also, Open IP means for us that we will share the modified strains which are optimized for the expression of the insulin, and ideally, we will be able to provide scientific knowledge and resources to help the creation of local manufacturing plant.