I’m confused by this comment. There is evidence that Vit D deficiencies have all sorts of health impacts, and that supplements raise in-blood levels.
What other evidence is needed?
Most things related to vitamin D are just correlation. If you are weak and frail you may not get out much and won’t have so much vitamin D. That doesn’t mean giving you vitamin D will make you strong. I heard that most studies don’t show benefits from vitamin D a supplements but maybe I’m wrong.
Oral vitamin D supplementation between 700 to 800 IU/d appears to reduce the risk of hip and any nonvertebral fractures in ambulatory or institutionalized elderly persons. An oral vitamin D dose of 400 IU/d is not sufficient for fracture prevention. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/20087...
High levels of vitamin D among middle-age and elderly populations are associated with a substantial decrease in cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. If the relationship proves to be causal, interventions targeting vitamin D deficiency in adult populations could potentially slow the current epidemics of cardiometabolic disorders. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03785...
————————————
At this point I got bored of looking at results (I omitted a few which only looked for correlations).
So while there is some evidence of some benefits for some people, I didn’t find evidence of vitamin d being the magic panacea that it sometimes feels it is claimed to be by people on the internet.
https://www.bulletproof.com/supplements/vitamins-minerals/vi... (11 scientific references linked at the bottom)