I do find it odd, though, that this piece calls out the person with the lowest bot count. Why target a specific person if your concern is bots? Why target the person with the least amount of bots? It makes the post feel disingenuous.
If we trust twitter audit over her (which tbf I don't see any good reason to trust one over another) then her piece seems at best naive and at worse a hit piece.
Knowing Yang Gang, and knowing that there's a lot of people turning from Trump (they literally pride themselves on it [0,1,2,3,4], I can go on pretty easily with a lot like [2]), it makes me inclined to believe that the analysis is naive (I'm hesitant to call this a hit piece) because she mentioned the suspicion of MAGA and YG. MAGA and YG connections makes a lot of sense if you just checked out the subreddit for ten minutes.
If we trust twitter audit over her (which tbf I don't see any good reason to trust one over another) then her piece seems at best naive and at worse a hit piece.
Knowing Yang Gang, and knowing that there's a lot of people turning from Trump (they literally pride themselves on it [0,1,2,3,4], I can go on pretty easily with a lot like [2]), it makes me inclined to believe that the analysis is naive (I'm hesitant to call this a hit piece) because she mentioned the suspicion of MAGA and YG. MAGA and YG connections makes a lot of sense if you just checked out the subreddit for ten minutes.
[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/YangForPresidentHQ/comments/et3v4z/...
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/YangForPresidentHQ/comments/et24dh/...
[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/YangForPresidentHQ/comments/ekhp4o/...
[3] https://www.reddit.com/r/YangForPresidentHQ/comments/epq2dd/...
[4] https://www.reddit.com/r/YangForPresidentHQ/comments/cn5vsl/...