Bernie and warren have multiple official accounts. At least two I know of for each.
@berniesanders: 69% | 7,052,953 Real | 3,124,469 Fake
@sensanders: 74% | 6,480,666 Real | 2,171,758 Fake
@senwarren: 68% | 3,668,103 Real | 1,694,620 Fake
@ewarren: 84% | 2,966,118 Real | 560,776 Fake
So cumulatively the scores are more like:
Bernie: 71% Total non-fake followers: 8,237,392
Warren: 79% Total non-fake followers: 4,939,601
At the end of the day the percentage/ratio of real to fake doesn't matter. What matters is the REAL people following a candidate, Besides trump, Bernie beats all others.
Disclaimer: My account looks like a Bernie Bot, but my followers real % is 85 which actually surprised me lol. I'd support Yang or Tulsi. Probably not anybody else running. I'm an independent, and align more with leftist/socialist libertarianism (not the GOP think-tank ran version of American libertarianism). I don't just vote for any 'blue' because they're blue. I don't do party politics.
I do find it odd, though, that this piece calls out the person with the lowest bot count. Why target a specific person if your concern is bots? Why target the person with the least amount of bots? It makes the post feel disingenuous.
If we trust twitter audit over her (which tbf I don't see any good reason to trust one over another) then her piece seems at best naive and at worse a hit piece.
Knowing Yang Gang, and knowing that there's a lot of people turning from Trump (they literally pride themselves on it [0,1,2,3,4], I can go on pretty easily with a lot like [2]), it makes me inclined to believe that the analysis is naive (I'm hesitant to call this a hit piece) because she mentioned the suspicion of MAGA and YG. MAGA and YG connections makes a lot of sense if you just checked out the subreddit for ten minutes.
@berniesanders: 69% | 7,052,953 Real | 3,124,469 Fake
@sensanders: 74% | 6,480,666 Real | 2,171,758 Fake
@senwarren: 68% | 3,668,103 Real | 1,694,620 Fake
@ewarren: 84% | 2,966,118 Real | 560,776 Fake
So cumulatively the scores are more like:
Bernie: 71% Total non-fake followers: 8,237,392
Warren: 79% Total non-fake followers: 4,939,601
At the end of the day the percentage/ratio of real to fake doesn't matter. What matters is the REAL people following a candidate, Besides trump, Bernie beats all others.
Disclaimer: My account looks like a Bernie Bot, but my followers real % is 85 which actually surprised me lol. I'd support Yang or Tulsi. Probably not anybody else running. I'm an independent, and align more with leftist/socialist libertarianism (not the GOP think-tank ran version of American libertarianism). I don't just vote for any 'blue' because they're blue. I don't do party politics.