Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That's true, people could become more minimalist and work a lot less. Actually, minimalism seems to be a growing trend right now, but I think this has more to do with necessity than minimalism as a philosophy. For me, it's a little of both.



I think that's the case for most people. Especially as we age, healthcare becomes more important. And it's the healthcare that gets a lot of people.

(At least that's the case in the US. I don't really know much about other nations and their retirement setups.)


In the UK we treat healthcare as a common problem across the country.

I believe in the US you only do this with the most expensive, wealthiest people (medicare), and let those who actually work for a living be ravaged by the russian roulette of things like cancer.

There was a suggestion that people with large amount of unearned wealth (land) in the UK should have to pay towards their care homes out of whatever capital they had left at the end of their life, rather than increasing the burden on the non-wealthy workers who can barely make rent, let alone buy a house.

That went down like a lead baloon with the wealthy pensioners, as if forcing brexit on the young wasn't enough, they want the young to pay for their healthcare.

There are no major parties suggesting mass euthanasia of those age 70, I suspect such a party would do well.


Strange - health care is like a civil right, unless they have money then its an excuse to fleece people? Do I have that right?


It’s a right, like defence, policing and education. It gets paid for by those that work hardest/smartest/longest. The Tory plan was to get those that benefited from unearned gained in wealth to pay for it too.


Hm. Or paid for by those that happen to have interest on accounts, and do nothing for it.

Anyway, we decide on civil rights because we're a just society, not out of some column on a financial ledger. They should be separate issues.


The idea was the country would increase funding for the elderly, and increase taxation on the rich. This was rejected, mainly by rich old people.


That is how I read it, maybe there is a subtlety I am missing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: