Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Ketosis is a medical condition that is potentially harmful and even deadly in some cases

it is not compatible with certain diseases or other medical conditions, but blanket statement like that is bullshit.




There is a very real risk of kidney damage, if not supervised by a medical professional.


source needed. proper hydration and not overeating protein means kidneys will be fine.


Keto and paleo are by definition "overeating protein".


If you’re going to make a blanket statement like this, would you also provide the definitions you’re working with? Ketosis (not to be confused with ketoacidosis) is a metabolic cycle. Paleo is a diet which, while having no completely agreed upon definition that I’m aware of, often focuses on limiting grain-based sources of carbohydrates. If your definition of “overeating protein” is based on a ratio of macronutrients, that’s something that can be usefully discussed; similarly if you’re referring to some quantity of protein. As it is, you’ve stated something which really isn’t helpful in moving discussion forward.


I'm not going to argue with fanatics.


just as i said - inform yourself on the topic, come arguing later. you have no idea what you're talking about.

just to not leave you completely uninformed - general guideline for protein on keto is 1g per kilogram of bodyweight. i really want to see how will you argue that that is "overeating protein", especially considering that you're "deep in crossfit world".


You're welcome to stick with your pseudoscientific fad diets, it has no effect on my life.


of course you have nothing to say when factual data gets involved :) good luck


I would have something to say if you came with actual data. I've provided expert opinions that keto and Paleo are objectively bad. You've provided nothing but emotional arguments and pseudoscience.


> I would have something to say if you came with actual data.

the actual data is that protein consumption on keto is 1g per kilogram of bodyweight.

the question is why do you think that is "overeating protein", and if you don't - you're obviously thinking of a different number and the question becomes what it is and where did you get that number?

> expert opinions that keto and Paleo are objectively bad

expert opinion is by definition not objective, it's an opinion. you haven't even provided any evidence that keto is "bad". from everything you've said the only conclusion i can make is that you have no idea what keto is at all.


The only positive thing keto does (as a side effect) is cut down on simple sugars. Everything else is counterproductive at best.

You're putting your body in an emergency state and stressing your overall health. It can work short term, if you're conscious of the dangers (especially ketoacidosis), but it absolutely shouldn't be done on the long term, unless you have a very specific medical need (such as epilepsy).

And as always, short term diets are silly and can cause more harm than good. Long term lifestyle change is what is actually needed, not short term fad diets.


so still no comment on protein? unless we get to the bottom of this, everything you're saying about keto comes with a huge blinking neon sign "HAS NO IDEA WHAT KETO IS"?

> emergency state

nope. it's a state our bodies have evolved to survive in. there is no scientific evidence that ketosis is harmful.

> if you're conscious of the dangers (especially ketoacidosis)

ketoacidosis is impossible to achieve on keto diet unless you are trying VERY hard. seriously, inform yourself on the topic https://www.healthline.com/health/ketosis-vs-ketoacidosis

> absolutely shouldn't be done on the long term

you know that because?

> Long term lifestyle change is what is actually needed, not short term fad diets

totally agree. the difference is that i know that keto is a valid long term lifestyle and there is no evidence of it being harmful, while the benefits i observe every day.


>it's a state our bodies have evolved to survive in

In an emergency

Which is absolutely not the same thing as a healthy long term state.


so what about that overeating protein? and what about your ketoacidosis fud? will you concede you were wrong?

> Which is absolutely not the same thing as a healthy long term state.

you call it emergency because you were told by some fad vegan food blogger to call it that because "emergency" comes with negative connotations.

it's just a different metabolic state, there is no evidence that it is harmful long term. unless you want to present some?


>fad vegan food blogger

What? Hell no.

I'm advocating for a healthy, balanced diet as part of a healthy, balanced lifestyle. "Eat food, mostly plants, not too much", and cut out those simple sugars and processed foods. Simple as that.

No fads, just a basic long term lifestyle change that works, without buzzwords, without fancy diets, without expensive books or courses or gurus.

And without the risks associated with ketogenic diets:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11575609

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0013-9580.2005....

https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/elsevier/sudden-cardiac-death-in...

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105913111...


i have to keep repeating this: so what about that overeating protein? and what about your ketoacidosis fud? will you concede you were wrong?

> healthy, balanced diet as part of a healthy, balanced lifestyle

there can be more than one healthy and balanced diet

> long term lifestyle change that works, without buzzwords, without fancy diets, without expensive books or courses or gurus.

yep, keto can be like this. no buzzwords, gurus, courses or books, just basic scientific facts about body metabolism.

> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11575609

9-yo girl with seizure disorder and ketogenic diet prescription since infancy. single case in 70 years of such treatment.

> http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0013-9580.2005.....

retrospective study of epilepsy patients treated with the KD during 1995 through 2003 at the Korean multicenters

Conclusions: The KD is a safe and effective alternative therapy for intractable childhood epilepsy in Korea, although the customary diet contains substantially less fat than traditional Western diets, but life-threatening complications should be monitored closely during follow-up.

> https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/elsevier/sudden-cardiac-death-in....

more reports about complications in patients treated from seizures.

> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105913111....

evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ketogenic diet (KD) treatment of refractory childhood epilepsy

Conclusions The KD is a safe and efficacious therapy for intractable childhood epilepsy in Chinese children. The influence of age on efficacy is worth further investigation.

do you spot the similarities? all those are reports about patients with epilepsy/seizures. some had complications. for most KD was effective in reducing seizures.

making any implications from that data about effects on healthy individuals is ridiculous FUD.


Listen, I'm not going to stop you from keto or paleo or homeopathy or any other wild idea.

Just be aware that the claimed scientific proof for its effectiveness is shaky at best, and there are definite dangers, which is why a medical professional should be consulted before starting.

It may be fine for you, but you are not everyone.

There is a hell of a lot of Dunning-Kruger effect going on in nerd circles, where high technical skill in one area is mistakenly believed to mean equal mastery in all other subjects. In this case it is nutrition, where a group of people have decided that they've "cracked the metabolism's secrets", "dieticians hate this one easy trick!"-style. It doesn't work that way, though. There are no easy shortcuts to weight loss and health, no matter how you stress your metabolism.

Health is simple, but it is not easy.

Dollars to donuts (ha!) your overall increase in health happened because you now look at lot more carefully at what you eat, plus cut out simple sugars completely. That is a very good lifestyle change, and enough to make up for the negatives of ketogenic diets, giving a net positive.


you still refuse to answer: so what about that overeating protein? and what about your ketoacidosis fud? will you concede you were wrong?

> claimed scientific proof for its effectiveness is shaky at best

studies show the opposite: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2716748/

> there are definite dangers

yeah, for kids with epilepsy. still best treatment so far even despite complications.

none of this allows you to make any conclusions about harmful effects on healthy individuals.

> In this case it is nutrition, where a group of people have decided that they've "cracked the metabolism's secrets", "dieticians hate this one easy trick!"-style. It doesn't work that way, though. There are no easy shortcuts to weight loss and health, no matter how you stress your metabolism.

you're still in the mindset that keto is short term fat loss fad diet. it isn't, it's a longterm lifestyle change.

> That is a very good lifestyle change, and enough to make up for the negatives of ketogenic diets

of which you have yet to show any evidence.

this whole thread is you reiterating the same crap and me constantly asking to back it up with some evidence. it's getting tiresome.


Keto is deliberately putting your metabolism into survival mode. It is putting a stress factor on the organism.

The study you link claims to study a "long term ketogenic diet", but only cover a 24-week period. That's less than 6 months.

That is absolutely not "long term". When talking about long term in diet and lifestyle terms, we are talking about several years, hopefully the entire remainder of a person's life.

Maybe the keto diet is making your tired and argumentative (a well-known side effect). There is no reason to be belligerent, just because I don't believe in your chosen fad diet.

https://asunow.asu.edu/content/low-carb-diets-may-stress-bod...


> The study you link claims to study a "long term ketogenic diet", but only cover a 24-week period. That's less than 6 months.

24 weeks is 6 months give or take few days. but obviously you will keep coming up with higher barriers no matter the evidence presented to you.

you silence on this one is very telling: so what about that overeating protein? and what about your ketoacidosis fud? will you concede you were wrong?

inform yourself on the topic, then come arguing.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: