I think it's one of the worst names I've ever heard. Both because of the bug, but also because of the first syllable. That's not going to stop me from using it if I have to, but I'm certainly less interested in trying it out. And I would be embarrassed to put "Cockroach Expert" on my resume.]
Disclaimer: I've come up with my fair share of bad names. SCM Breeze [1] makes me cringe now.
I'm sorry it comes across that way, but I'm not really "offended" by it. I just think it's a gross name and it gives me a bad feeling. It's not something I can really control.
What is it with Spencer Kimball and naming things that gets people so upset? It's not like other company or product names are that good; we're just used to them.
Some high profile tech companies:
- Google: some propellerhead big number joke (hey, I have a Phd and I don't know offhand how big a googleplex is...)
- Alphabet: Really? That out of ideas?
- Amazon: Some hot snake and insect-infested jungle? Why should I go there?
- Microsoft: At least it gives a hint what the company does, but really... (cue the penis jokes)
- Yahoo: WTF, some slang term I've never heard of before..
- Apple: Mmmm, are they organic and locally produced? Oh, they sell computers and phones? WTF?! (Yes, I've heard the backstory about Alan Turing and the poisoned apple which I guess puts me in a very small minority)
There's bad name, and then there's repulsive name.
All the examples you mention fall under "bad name", and it's not even objectively bad, I actually think they're great names, so it's subjective. And NONE of them are repulsive.
Then again, if you insist cockroaches are lovable creatures I have nothing more to say.
> All the examples you mention fall under "bad name", and it's not even objectively bad, I actually think they're great names, so it's subjective. And NONE of them are repulsive.
My argument was not that they are good or bad, but rather that we've come to associate positive things with the companies in question, and then we post-hoc come up with explanations why they names are good etc.
> Then again, if you insist cockroaches are lovable creatures I have nothing more to say.
I don't think they are lovable, no. But they are an evolutionary success story; they've been around for hundreds of millions of years, long before humans. And they'll be here after we humans have extincted ourselves in some nuclear holocaust/massive environmental disaster/pick your favorite apocalyptic scenario/.
And if you manage to squish one, there's hordes of em left; just like I'd like my DB to be, so actually I think it's a very good name! :)
There's no post-hoc for some of those names. Some of them were picked because they actually were good. Even something as bland as 'Microsoft' fit right in with the culture that spawned it. And the rest were picked because they were simple, neutral, and had the potential to be iconic brands.
Cockroach is not something someone picks because it is good. That's a name you pick to make a statement that your name doesn't 'technically' matter beyond the fact that it is memorable and associative.
While a little over the top... I do partly agree. In addition to GIMP, git bugs me a little bit, not enough to ever consider not using it, but the term is more or less offensive depending on the culture you're in.
