Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That rummaging, though, is extremely restricted from the perspective of traditional privacy concerns -- it's not like someone at Google gets to look up what John Q. Smith searched for on this day. The analogy would be more like, "would you consider it private if a robot could look at each safe deposit box and add a special flyer to the ones with gloves in them, and then only in special circumstances does anyone get to look at anonymized box/flyer pairings to see if the robot did it right?"



  The team members, as part of their responsibilities for 
  troubleshooting technical issues related to the site and 
  Google’s products, have access to users’ accounts. 
  Apparently Barksdale exceeded this authorized access to 
  spy on a group of specific people he’d met.


  Another former site reliability engineer told Gawker that 
  Google gives such engineers unfettered access and “does 
  not closely monitor SREs to detect improper access to 
  customers’ accounts, because SREs are generally considered 
  highly experienced engineers who can be trusted.”

https://www.wired.com/2010/09/google-spy/


But I assume that doesn't happen! Therefore it doesn't!


Except the flier gets written by a third party and reports to the third party who reads it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: