_giorgio_ is probably not a vi/vim/nvim/neovim user..
Many years ago I used vimperator and it made Firefox behave with a very much vi-like experience. Unfortunately, the halfway implementation of Vimium (and Tridactyl) is too annoying for me so I don't have it installed.
I don't know about you, but I've been working in three workplaces where union had the power - no more. From my experience, the union staff consists of people that work in their own interest and who don't really have any interest at all to do work related tasks.
They may have a role in factories, but not in the tech areas where us, users of Hacker News, belong.
The browser history worked fine while the web still was rather static. Not so much now with dynamically generated pages where the content changes for better ..or worse. A tab, in contrast, keeps its state. There are tools, such as SingleFile, Zotero, Pocket, screenshot, "print/save" to PDF etc.. but depending on content, an open tab is convenient enough.
Do tabs that are unloaded keep much state? My understanding was that they basically loaded as if a fresh navigation except for some extra form field preservation.
Or is the active state serialized to disk somehow?
Not much state is kept: maybe about as much as if you were to navigate to the page again with the back button (which is an annoyingly little nowadays).
Ok. Your comment brought nothing very interesting in my humble opinion. What's your opinion on the move? What particularly makes sense to move Trueness to Linux?
The original ixSystems explanation was what made the most sense: their engineers spent more time developing freebsd itself than trunas. Unlike on linux, where the ratio was different. So it's not a surprise, that they prefer the better maintained platform.
ZFS is maturing on Linux and the codebase and general focus is on Linux today.
Hardware compatibility and mindshare are also big factors.
It seems like a subset of the TrueNAS community reveled in the fact that Core was FreeBSD-based. Maybe just a bit contrarian.
I've had meh experiences supporting, repairing and transitioning installations away from ixSystems. I wouldn't advocate their offerings in the first place, but it does seem like you have unrealistic expectations from ixSystems.
I honestly fail to see in what aspect Kubernetes is poorly documented? It is complex yes, but just about any aspect I've come by is documented. I think that one reason that the documentation at kubernetes.io is kept in a rather short format may be to avoid it to become overwhelming.
reply