Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | socks's commentslogin

is this chatgpt? your comments read like chatgpt output


I do ask chatgpt to improve my messages, but the content is mine.


Honestly, that comment really does not seem very chatGPT-like.


it screams it to me - wording such as "your concerns are valid", "yes, you're absolutely right..." and "I realize now how important...", and then usage of em-dash


As mentioned in another comment, I used ChatGPT to improve grammar and rewrite a bit my messages. I stopped using it since.


It's okay to be authentically you


Last time I was trying to be authentically me my response triggered a whole sub-thread about me using the word "subvention" and how funny Europeans sounds to Americans.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯


I have this too, many words I get from French and turn into English do exist in reality (they sound natural to me) and bam! there you have a snob who wants to show off :)


What is this obsession with the em-dash? For those who used LaTeX it is second nature, and a -- gets changed to an em-dash by a lot of editors or programs such as AutoHotkey


I may have to stop using Em-dashes.


Reminds me of this old HN thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4353389


Pure chance - what should get assigned to me mere hours after reading this article but a ticket regarding SCIM users not being disabled with Entra...

> It turns out that Microsoft’s default behavior sends a boolean value as a string

> You can force Microsoft to send you the proper JSON if you use a certain feature flag (aadOptscim062020), but that’s really not an obvious solution!

Boom. That was exactly my issue.

> This sort of stuff is very time-consuming and demoralizing to resolve.

I would have sunk hours into this - thanks Ned O'Leary - you made my day!


ha! I'm glad to hear


Scavenger's Reign was really excellent - but as I was watching it, I had an inkling that I would likely be in a small cohort of people who love it.


The art of Scavenger’s Reign was really good. The ecosystem was really interesting (a bit overly-clever for stuff that is supposed to have evolved IMO, but it was still really interesting). Really great setting and art.

The plot and characters felt a bit shallow/stereotypical/predictable in a bad way.

It’s like they had too much of the ecosystem that they wanted to show, so they split it up among too many characters, and didn’t invest the appropriate character development in each. Plus, I really want to steep in the ecosystem, the rush to get to the ship is, IMO, not really necessary (it serves to force the characters to explore the environment, but IMO some alternative force that doesn’t put the characters on such a tight timer would be preferable). I often found myself thinking: wow, I wish the characters could take more time exploring this phenomenon, but also, the character should, given their in-character motivation, leave this interesting thing alone. They are wasting precious time.

I’d love to see a Mushishi like series set in that universe. Focus on one character’s journey through the ecosystem. Give the character motivation to unravel the mysteries instead of dodge them.


FWIW Scavenger's Reign's creators have been making the show Common Side Effects. It's a brilliant show in its own right IMO but the animation is nowhere near as high-effort.


Oh, wow, I’ve been loving Common Side Effects. Didn’t realize it was the same people.

Common Side Effects has great characters IMO, it really captures this tension where the alternative to selling out is to accomplish nothing, maybe.


Gravity Falls is another 'kids' show that is absolutely brilliant.


unfortunately, I have a feeling that in the age of LLMs, this junior on the team will have no impetus to actually put in effort and _think_ about such a problem


We survived the age of StackOverflow. I don't see why LLM's will be the death of critical thinking where all else has failed so far.


Because SO at least requires you to THINK a little about what do you have a problem with.

With LLMs, you don't even need that. Just copy paste the error and you get a response. Copy and paste the Jira ticket description and you get a response. This wasn't possible with SO. Yes, none of those will likely work straight away but the point is that less thinking is required.

Hopefully, the junior's code will be reviewed before it gets merged


I can't imagine blindly committing what LLMs spit out will get you very far, much less into a job.


It's quite fashionable, people call it "vibe coding" with Cursor in "yolo mode"


I don't think LLMs are actually good enough for their code to work without any changes in all but the very simplest of cases.


Did we survive the age of StackOverflow though? The market (globally) is absolutely flooded with not-even-mediocre software devs who are effectively doing what an LLM is i.e. finding the most plausible looking answers on SO and somehow munging them together, without any real understanding of what they're doing nor why it's working (or not working). The number of people charging contract rates yet lacking an understanding of actual software design principles (largely language agnostic) and no idea how computers actually work, is scary.


Totally, the future is nearly identical to the past.


At least in the towns and cities, I believe it is because the utility companies can cut up the roads, but the cuts are never repaired to the same quality, allowing water ingress and creating weaknesses that seem to 'seed' potholes.

I used to live in Edinburgh and the roads were like an uneven tar patchwork.


Where we lived the road was very country, grass up the middle etc. A gas company went to put mains gas in, and they made such a bad job of the road it was almost undrivable. The council actually made them go back and resurface it fully, after that the road's one of the best around, certainly for the size of it.

The damage that gas company did to it and the state they left it in after putting the gas in though was atrocious.


their pricing page states

> We plan to make money by helping clients secure additional financial products like secured lines of credit, margin, and insurance, all in a fiduciary manner.


not really. banking systems have firewalls and access controls. quantum computations would be useless.


Those don't really mean anything when an attacker can eavesdrop on customer and employee comms and possibly redirect transactions (MITM).


Banking communications and transactions will all be protected by quantum-resistant protocols and ciphers well before that will become a problem. Most of these already exist, and some of them can even be deployed.


I really disliked beer until I was about 25 years old. I kept occasionally trying it, maybe because my girlfriend liked beer, and one day, to my surprise, found a particular beer I really liked. Trying new craft beers is now a bit of a passion, and have had over 250 different beers (I avoid buying repeats [unless extremely good] or a multipack)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: