Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rcraft's comments login

If random Twitter users send @mentions to "@mywebrtclobby" then no other users will likely see these tweets unless they already follow each of the various Twitter users sending the @mentions.

However if you connected @mywebRTClobby with https://GroupTweet.com you could configure things so that any @mentions (from authorized users or anyone) would be converted into actual tweets from the @mywebRTClobby account so that all followers would actually see those tweets/contact details.


Haha I don't use Twitter so I'm not surprised I got something wrong... thanks for fixing that bug.


It used to be the case you could see all @mentions someone received, but alas not anymore.


So if you use a VPN and incognito mode without logging into any online account, Google, Facebook, et al can still track you accurately?

Curious any other tools besides vpn and private mode you would recommend?

Any more links to read about these behaviorial, software and and type style tracking methods?


https://ssd.eff.org/en -- this is a great start and will lead you down a rabbit hole of links, tools, and intrigue :-)


Care to name products/companies? It would be fun to play around with a VPN and see what variations in pricing would really happen.


Love these type of tools especially when using with github pages.

Anyone have any other tool recommendations that work well with github pages and other static sites?


I use Formspree [0] for GitHub Pages hosted stuff, and it is dead simple. I've never been spammed, as it requires a human click ("I'm not a robot") for the email to send.

[0] https://formspree.io


Staticman[0] is great. Same principle where you only have to POST to an API but with user content stored in Github. There's a free hosted version and it's open source.

[0] https://staticman.net/

Edit: Disclaimer: the company I work for Sponsor their hosting.


A stupid (but working!) solution I came up with the other day. Submit forms from your static site to Telegram: https://telegram.me/submissionsbot


To be fair, once you hit 260 characters, it starts counting down, showing you that you have 20 characters left.

I like the circle. It puts less emphasis on number of characters you are using, so perhaps people won't be as motivated to use up all 280.


Are there any other insurers that don't do/want many of these same things?


For those in one of the covered regions[1], Kaiser Permanente is largely not-evil. You have to go through your GP to get referrals to specialists, but it's a series of mostly consistent "I have X problem" "Try Y" "Didn't work" "Try Z" "Didn't Work" "OK, let's get you to a specialist" events.

They have an interesting governance structure (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaiser_Permanente) that tries to align incentives correctly.

[1]: Coverage areas as divided by corporate entities:

  Northern California
  Southern California
  Colorado
  Georgia
  Hawaii
  Mid-Atlantic (vicinity of Washington, D.C., including Maryland and Virginia)
  Northwest (Northwest Oregon and Southwest Washington)
  Washington (except Southwest Washington)


Lots of people complain about Kaiser. I was a member when I was growing up, and have signed up again now that I have a job offering Kaiser coverage.

For me Kaiser is a couple things. First of all it is peace of mind. They won't screw you. Essentially everything they offer is covered at a reasonable rate. Example: I was sent to the emergency room once and was able to pay on the spot with the cash in my wallet. Secondly, if you go to one of their medical centers everything is in that building. When I am sick, I don't want to go to a few stops across town to get everything (doctors office, lab, pharmacy, etc).

Additionally they actively do things to keep people healthy. They host farmers markets at some of their centers, run advertisements focused on getting exercise and eating well. In general, they make you feel like they are on your side.


I have Kaiser too and I stayed an extra day (vs average) after my unplanned C-section because of pain management issues, and nobody bothered me about it despite the floor being full. Only $500 and that included a salmon and steak and apple cider in champagne flutes celebration dinner one night for me and my partner. Their prenatal and postpartum support is top notch too, including free lactation consultant visits and a hospital grade pump rental (would cost me $1k+ at this point in fees otherwise) to support breastfeeding for as long as I want.

Compare to one of my friends with a bog-standard vaginal birth, was pressured to leave as soon as possible, partner kept getting kicked out of the room, and she paid $7k and counting while still getting random claims. LC visits also not covered despite wanting to breastfeed desperately, and she gave up due to issues that could have been resolved.

It's not even just the baby stuff that is like this - my dad has their medicare advantage plan and he LOVES it and I love the integrated care since it's so easy for his specialists to talk to each other without me having to be the messenger.

Kaiser gets a bad rap a lot of times, sometimes for good reason, but in the average case, they must be doing something okay that they don't fight me like Anthem used to do ALL THE TIME (plus remember when maternity coverage cost like $500 extra _per month_ on the individual market?)


I think BlueCross and United Health only do some of the evil things, but I wouldn't swear to it.


You can easily use Twitter search logged out or without an actual Twitter account: https://twitter.com/search-home. Not hard to see the same google copy and pasters will just move to Twitter search.


Some thoughts on item #3:

Offering the ability to follow hashtags in their current form would simply lead to more hashtag spam.

However I agree with your basic premise that following topics and geographical Tweets would be very useful. One of the main reasons I built GroupTweet. Allow people to form and manage "group" topical or location based accounts with any number of contributors while giving some admin controls like limiting approval to all or only select participants, moderation, etc.

Would love any feedback and suggestions on how we could improve to make your suggestions more of a reality.


Honest question - why not just unfollow those people that incessantly tweet worthless information?

I'm not saying its easy to find quality Twitter users to follow - but its certainly easy to unfollow bad users.

Twitter could certainly improve their algorithms that recommend people to follow, surface good content, etc.


That's one of the reasons I built GroupTweet. To facilitate private group communication on Twitter with any number of participants that can persist through permanent Twitter accounts (instead of temporary Group DMs that are limited to 20 people).

Would love any feedback or suggestions on how it could be improved.

Happy to offer free use to anyone on this thread looking to test out the service.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: