Don't want to be too judgemental but does "Self Serve invite link" feature really needs 50 commits, an army of bots, countless nitpicking and 140+ messages? We are not launching Apollo to the Moon here.
I don't know this particular project but seeing threads like this kill any motivation to contribute.
"We are a fast moving start up (even at 3-4 years old), we believe in moving fast and breaking things ... That's why we don't do code reviews or unit tests.. we just edit live running code and restart the server"
Vs
"This one line change needs 4 -5 commits to add feature flags,unit tests, integration tests - all to be reviewed by different teams and wait 1-2 months to be deployed properly to production"
There's stories that bridge the gaps between the two models of explosions and fires and legally actionable fast moving breakages that bring new people into start-ups who put these processes into place and generally shift the culture towards cautiousness. Other industries need to start at point B, or otherwise learn the lessons that get you there _quickly_.
And now top nav breaks to second line on 63% on mobile devices and the submit button is now out of screen. I know these "how hard can it be?" type of changes
I worked for a big tech and may be I was lucky but code wise it was much more tame. You may need to get an army of people to sign off the feature but nobody was scrutinizing my code like that
> Haha, wait until you hear how long and how many people it takes to change the text for a single button at a company like Google
I feel this is a needlessly obtuse statement. I'll explain you why, as I've worked professionally with frontend development. From your comment it seems you don't have that type of context.
The text that is expected to feature in a UI element is a critical factor in cross cutting concerns such as product management and UX design, and it involves things like internationalization and accessibility support. This means that if you change a line of text, it needs to be translated to all supported languages, and the translation needs to meet usability and GUI requirements. This check needs to be done in each and every single locale supported.
I can give you a very concrete example. Once I was tasked with changing a single line of text in a button featured in a dialog. It turns out the french translation ended up being too long that forced line breaks. The UI framework didn't handled those line breaks well and reflowed the whole UI, causing a huge mess. This required new translation requests, but it turned out that the new translations were too vague and ambiguous. Product Managers got involved because the french translation resulted in poor user experience. Ultimately the whole dialog was redesigned.
But to you it's just a text on a single button, isn't it?
I think the problem is the detachment of a developer from what is being done. Many developers want to treat coding like a crative work, while corporations try to make it an automatic job that turns tickets into code. The fact that the person working on a dialog isn't aware that there are translations where things might force a different layout is a proof of a broken system.
I'm not saying that developer should also be UI specialist, that's nonsense. But a developer should know who to talk to regarding advice, and the contact should be easy. The model where a dev doesn't even know that French translation exists is wrong. The correct model is having a dev think "wait, this might affect translation, better send a Slack message to some UI guy and let him know".
Actually, what I said is a pipe dream. The reality is, most devs are average devs, and companies need to optimize processes for that. This results in very official communication that takes years to get anything done, because you can't trust average developer that they'll contact the UI guy. This leads to a lot of frustration from above-average developers, who simply need a different environment to shine (more freedom but also more responsibility)
It's actually not that easy, especially at scale. Background checks cost money/time + compliance requirements are vastly different between regions/states/cities.
And there are tons of government systems you need to get data from. And some counties require in-person visit to obtain court records. And you need those records to make valid assessments.
I personally like Linkedin - it's so trashy that it makes me work harder to retire early to get away from all those crazy prople. Or at least to close the tab ASAP.
Why are you so certain that flaws will be fixed? Seems like there is a giant leap between a machine spewing words based on probability and actual deep understanding of the code it's suppose to write
A "machine spewing words based on probability" is an implementation detail. I'm not making a grandiose prediction about the future. All I'm saying is that these machines are improving super fast.
I'm also stricken by the superficiality of analysis like "oh it's just probabilities" from so many devs; might as well say "it's magnets".
In my comment I was questioning the certainty that those fundamental flaws will be fixed. I'm one of those people who don't believe that iterating over LLM will make that giant leap.
You can call it an implementation detail but it's like both a wheel and a wing can take your over some distance but the difference between them is staggering. Wheel will never send you flying (normally)
I'd expect mid-level developer to show more understanding and better reasoning. So far it looks like a junior dev who read a lot of books and good at copy pasting from stackoverflow.
(Based on my everyday experience with Sonet and Cursor)
Biden administration (and even Obama back in 2014 when Russia actually started the war) has to share a good portion of blame but what Trump is doing right now is mental
> which should help prevent Russia from further invasion
How will that prevent further agression? There are many US companies that still operate in Russia and even on Russian occupied teritories?
> which will only bring Russia closer to countries like China and a much faster takeover of Taiwan
Russia has nothing to give to China in their Taiwan takeover anymore. What the whole situation does it gives China a clear signal that US doesn't give a fuck about allies and previous promises. They make a move tommorow and that administration will even praise each other for giving up Taiwan because "it's the same nation" and "look we prevented ww3"
> There needs to be more strategic ways of dealing with Russia.
Yes, they are. Russia made it clear that it has no ways for further escalation, had severe problems with its army (DPRK troops and ammo, donkeys and horses on the frontline) and economy (interest rate is 20%+). Tighten sanctions, provide more aid to Ukraine (even in the way of loan), etc. It's not a fast answer though. And requires to have some balls.
Working on my mobile semi-idle MMORPG for parents like myself. With the artstyle of 1980s/syntwave/cassette-futurism. Just finished the website over the weekend: https://afterglow-game.com/
In my twenties moved from Russia to Australia, then lived in the US for a couple of years to see how it is. Came back to Australia just before US elections and I'm very happy with my decision to live here.
It has its own problems but for me it feels to be a much nicer place to live peacefully, raise kids and enjoy life
I don't know this particular project but seeing threads like this kill any motivation to contribute.