Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | echaozh's comments login

> If a country that we are likely to be at war with has significant influencer over our population, that is indeed a big deal.

So, how will the war begin? Who will begin it? How long has the US or its allies been planning to start this war?


> So, how will the war begin? Who will begin it?

China will start it when they invade our ally Taiwan.

It would also, almost certainly involve a pre-emptive strike from china onto american forces. This would be because China knows that the only way to have even a chance of success is to strike first against the USA.

Maybe a politician will be elected in Taiwan that China really doesn't like. Maybe the decades long, existing trends will continue towards the Taiwanese people no longer thinking themselves as having any sort of chinese identity. Or maybe Xi will simply try to distract the population from problems at home with a foolish hopeless war. There are a lot of possibilities!

> How long has the US or its allies been planning

They aren't planning on starting a war. If China doesn't invade Taiwan, there will be no war.

But yes, the USA would absolutely defend Taiwan from an invasion, and already gives Taiwan weapons to do so.

I hope that some of the politicians in china will eventually learn how foolish such an invasion will be. Or, perhaps, China will simply saber rattle and do nothing like it has been sabre rattling for decades.

China has enough problems as it is, but there is still a chance that they will go off the deep end and invade our allies.

If that happens though, the USA will absolutely defend against such an invasion though.


It doesn't just so happens that solar is cheap energy. It's China who made solar cheap energy.


So did Beijing bomb the Uyghurs? Do you see Uyghurs anywhere cry for kins killed by bombs or houses destroyed? How can you compare China with Israel?

Also, sure Uyghurs killed Hans in riots, and they sure have conducted terrorist attacks in China.


Let's do a thought experiment. Please give this a honest consideration.

If the Uyghurs had 40,000 combatants. And if they were dug in tunnels under Uyghur cities. And fires 10's of thousands of rockets into Chinese cities. And killed thousands of people with hundreds of suicide bombings. Their cities were mined and booby trapped. Their combatants were well trained, armed with RPGs, sniper rifles, machine guns.

Then the Uyghurs raided some Chinese city, killing 1200 people, taking hundreds of hostages.

What do you think China would do?

China isn't bombing them because it doesn't need to bomb them.

Uyghurs have less people that care about them in the international community, for sure. I'm not sure they're not suffering a lot more than the Palestinians are.


If china's goal is to wipe them out as a people, its more effective to do that quietly.

Having Uyghurs cry for their kins brings international attention. Having them slowly deported to camps and sterialized brings about the same result without that pesky international pressure.


Why not "Kings English" now, as the Queen, well, is gone?


It's Deepseek, not Deepseed, just so people can actually find the model.


If tenses are cases are what keeps languages from being global, you should all speak Chinese now, whose words don't change forms at all.


> you should all speak Chinese now, whose words don't change forms at all

There are some inflectional elements in Chinese.

Speaking for Mandarin:

- Verbs may be inflected into one of three aspects, with the suffixes 着 (progressive), 了 (perfective), or 过 (experiential).

- Certain verbs may be inflected for possibility or impossibility, with the infix 得 (for possibility) or 不 (for impossibility). If the verb is not naturally part of the category that participates in this construction, the dummy particle 了 (which shares spelling, but not pronunciation, with the perfect suffix mentioned above) must be supplied, to convert it into that category.

- Nouns may be inflected for plurality with the suffix 们. As I understand it, this is only really appropriate where the noun refers to a collection of people (broadly defined), but any such noun may receive the suffix.


Yeah but doesn't the way you intone a word change the meaning entirely? With how heavy accents are the norm for English second speakers I would think this makes Chinese practically impossible to learn to pronounce. Also 90% of the world can read the latin alphabet already which is a good start when learning a new language. Years ago I made a small attempt to learn some Russian and Cyrillic was like smashing against a brick wall, I imagine it's 200x worse for Chinese since you have to learn 5000 new characters.


It could be a large deposit, to be returned if the case is verified, or to be rewarded to the victim if it turn out to be vicious.


I like this. Large deposit with some gov agency and the money gets awarded to the victim (or refunded to the claimant) when the dispute is finally resolved. You don't submit a claim unless you're really sure that you'd win.

This is how the DMCA should have been designed in the first place.


Taking Taiwan back won't make a Chinese leader "great". It is more of a responsibility and sort of a minor one, as a not so famous general (Shi Lang) in Qing dynasty achieved this and people have criticized and are still criticizing him for his betrayal to the Ming dynasty.

Deng Xiaoping brought Hong Kong and Macao back, but he was memorated as a great leader not because of this, but because he opened the door for China to its economic prosperity.


So what you're saying, is:

Xi needs to take Korea and Japan too?


Perhaps the dying Chinese people are more willing to donate their organs and there are more Chinese people dying as there are more people in China?


Currently in 2020. Later the primary source becomes India. China actually did put an end to the shipping.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: