Google's "customer support" is so bad, I think it would be a huge mistake to let them control your domains. Dealing with Google's "support" has been a nightmare over and over on many unrelated issues.
They also abandon many projects or hold you hostage in extremely inconvenient ways.[1]
Which customer support? I've heard nothing but good things for the actual customer support you pay for ( Google One) as a consumer, and a mixed bag for the not-enterprise GCP support you kinda pay for.
I’ve had simple issues with Google Ads that took MONTHS to resolve. Basically their algorithm marked one of my sites as having an image that contained malware. There was nothing I could do about it. That’s right, somehow they think a PNG hosted on AWS Cloudfront had malware. It was absurd, and they kept canceling my ads and never fixing the problem. Their customer service is atrocious.
People have been complaining about this for years. Besides Google Cloud, have they addressed this or do they keep ignoring it? Does anyone know if Google Cloud has customer service that's equivalent to AWS?
It isn't just Google Cloud. I've had absolutely terrible experiences with several Google support departments. It's often impossible or difficult to resolve the problems.
A domain isn't the kind of thing that you can quickly move somewhere else when things go wrong.
I could be convinced to put up with the lack of customer support if the price is right, but the price is higher than competitors. I'll stick with Cloudflare Registrar.
Internal search can often be scammy though. If you search Google for products, you'll land on an Amazon page, but if you do your search on Amazon instead, they will sometimes only show you more expensive versions of the general product, as if the cheap one that you were looking for doesn't exist.
I don't think browsers let you share passwords between users or multiple browsers. They probably don't let you store secure notes or add extra data about logins.
1password lets you share passwords with other people, even if they don't have a 1password account.
I don't understand the anger about the VPN. I think it's a good idea. Reader mode is useful, especially if you block a lot of CSS and JavaScript by default with uMatrix.
I don't know why people use DOH anyway. It bypasses your hosts file, so you can't block things as easily.
Many people wouldn't otherwise sign up for a VPN, and there are a lot of shady VPNs out there. Mozilla can use the feature to help reduce dependence on a company that has been trying to destroy them for years (Google), and help non-tech people get set up with a VPN.
Google is the largest financial supporters in Firefox, they buy Firefox search bar. If they wanted to destroy Firefox, they’d already do it by simply cutting that revenue stream.
They can't do it like that directly, but they have been undercutting Firefox for years. For a long time when you searched Google from Firefox it would tell you to download Chrome.
Or some other search engine would become their revenue stream, like when Yahoo was the default search. Without Google bidding their revenue would likely drop, but it wouldn't disappear.
True. But revenue would be significantly smaller (other engines cannot afford pay high per click, and lack of competition drives the price per click down), and revenue is already barely enough to cover Mozilla needs (see recent staff cuts).
Pocket lacks some important features I want it to have so I decided negative when considering a paid subscription. Nevertheless I still like it and am glad it exists. It (pocket-based home page) also is my secondary major source of news about the world and curious facts (HN being the primary).
I’m sure it is useful to some people, heck I used it for a year or two before Mozilla had anything to do with it. That said I fail to see any reason Firefox should acquire it and make it first party. Might as well acquire a webmail, a feed aggregator and a video host while they were at it.
> I fail to see any reason Firefox should acquire it
Because it was profitable perhaps? Why not acquire a relevant profitable business (many already like) just for sake of profits? And pre-installing it by default seems the next obvious step to make it even more profitable.
> Might as well acquire a webmail, a feed aggregator and a video host while they were at it.
It's way harder to make these profitable without too much investment and without using severe user-annoying techniques.
Nevertheless it's already been suggested here a number of times that Mozilla should perhaps also re-invent e-mail.
It nags me all the time when opening a new container. I couldn't care less if it was a feature that I had to click away once, but it is really pushing and in your face.
So people should push Mozilla to add an about:config flag to turn it off, if it doesn't already exist. The solution is much simpler than demanding that Mozilla completely stop trying to find a way to reduce dependence on Google.
One thing though, most of these new features are mitigations of annoyances (popups, crazy formatting, too much js, lack of privacy). It's odd how devs are spending time to fight against something rather than the opposite.
It doesn't bypass my hosts file... I have a couple of locally hosted websites that I have rules in /etc/hosts for, and Firefox resolves them correctly even with DOH enabled.
It's not, Firefox will still check your hosts file to see if it can resolve that way. DoH is used only if using a local-only resolver doesn't work to my knowledge. Otherwise stuff like SMBIOS, Avahi/ZC or mDNS would break too.
That's what the VPN is for. People keep saying that they want to donate money to Mozilla. You can sign up for Firefox Private Network or Mozilla VPN for much better results than DOH, and give them a little money at the same time.
I'm not sure why you're getting downvoted. I often don't notice, and I've never heard anyone comment about those things. Most end users don't even know what those platforms are. Some apps look different than others just like some websites look different than others.
Not always. The main goal of HR is to protect the company and keep things running when sorting out problems between employees, not fairness.