Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | RamRodification's comments login

According to the post

> If you’re using Chrome, simply highlight some text, right-click, and you’ll find the “Copy link to highlight” option in the context menu


door://businesstreet/23/A/front


Someone understands URLs! The URL will be 30 years old soon[0], and still many people don't know what it really is.

[0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1738


No end user understands URLs this way. Unless Firefox teaches them this, then this is nonsense


Yes, It's a joke. Sorry


Is it? I thought you were being serious


Yes, it's a joke. Sorry.


Why, though? Isn't it actually a good suggestion?


Agree! And it's funny.


Where is the joke? I don't get it!


Why not both?


Not supported. It can't be anything.


As someone who does no programming at all, I can say that it kinda works.

It makes me think "Ok they have made a VMM again, but this time in that somehow safer programming language Rust. They probably know what they're doing so it will be just as good as the old one, only safer!".

I know enough to know that this is not necessarily true, but when I see these posts I always hope that it's true (and rely on people with the proper knowledge and experience to verify if it is or isn't).

Then I go to the comments and there is often a discussion about how a rewrite will probably be less secure because it will introduce new bugs. But then maybe those will be fixed and eventually it will just be a more secure version.


Doesn't the value drop dramatically if it has already been shared with Troy and the HIBP database? Or is there a time frame where it has been authenticated by Troy but not yet added to the database?


I don't think so.

Troy isnt publicly sharing the credentials and that's what's valuable — especially having "exclusive" access.

He blogged or tweeted about this at some point. Sadly, I can't find the link.


Is there more embarrassing pro-Zionist material on IA than there is embarrassing pro-Palestine (for lack of a better term for whatever "the opposite" is) material?


I would not know a mathematically accurate response to this question - but I did see a lot of references to embarrassing pro-Zionist (i.e. historically racist, colonialist, pro-Zionist) materials at the IA in the last week in various other forums, which are now no longer able to discuss the materials as they are unavailable.

If there is "pro-Palestinian" materials at the IA, I would imagine it being based on materials collected over the past year documenting the genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity being committed against them.

There is a definite effort to censor any and all reporting of Israeli crimes against humanity on the Internet - IA was probably a last refuged for those collecting this material.


Actually, there's plenty of obnoxious "pro-Palestinian" material out there as well, glorifying Operation al-Aqsa Flood, "martyrs" from other random attacks on civilians, not to mention the propaganda that there's no such thing as "Israeli civilian" anyway, and so forth. There's no need to go looking for it on the IA because they're quite proud of this stuff and are churning it out constantly. See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41692193

BTW I'm a non-Zionist and strongly opposed to the occupation, etc. So please don't make any assumptions that I'm a hasbarist coming at you with their usual stuff. The depressingly tragic fact of this conflict is that there are legions of assholes and extremely naive, easily manipulated people on all sides.


> Rest is history

;)


I read but 50 books in a year? No way.


That's only ~1 book a week, which seems perfectly doable? Definitely if we're talking about spending 1-2h/d on it.


It's literally a thing people do, sometimes specifically because it forces them to disconnect in their down time outside of work.


I could do 1-2 books in a day if I made time for it like I used to.


If only we could have different social norms so you didn't have to argue about it online!


Would it make you feel better if it had the title "Linux Horror Stories and Protection Spells (from the perspective of a spoiled Windows user)"? Does it really matter?


As far as I can tell they didn't mention windows at all, unless this author is notorious for something I'm not aware of. The only places windows turns up on that blog seems to be for instructions that also apply to windows.


Does that mean that it has a library of devices so that it knows what SNMP stuff from them means? (I barely know how SNMP works).


Yes. That's called SNMP MIBs, and LibreNMS has a lot of the standard/well known device MIBs to parse out the details.

https://docs.librenms.org/Support/FAQ/#how-does-librenms-use...


Cool thanks


Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: