Relying on aliases is the worse solution in my opinion. If it is protecting you too much, you will forget the risk and once for some reason you end up on a shell with a different profile you will forget about it and run a risky command.
% touch -- -i
% touch foo
% touch bar
% rm *
zsh: sure you want to delete all 3 files in /Users/shagie/test [yn]? y
remove bar? y
remove foo? y
% ls
-i
%
Linux huge advantage: It gives you huge flexiblity and very sharp knifes.
Linux drawback: Well, see above.
It takes getting used to if. As I keep joking - nuking your first production system is a bit of a rite of passage as a linux admin. My first was a "mv $WORKSPACE/* $WORKSPACE/bin". I also once caused a ridiculous mess by screwing up NTP. It doesn't count 100% imo, but one of our juniors recently wanted to reset a DB on a newly installed system and did a "rm -rf /var /lib/foobar" to delete the system state. Another pretty green colleague wanted to cleanup a bunch of db dumps and ran "rm -rf /var/lib/barqux/*". It certainly removed the database dumps, and the database too.
Both are now educated in the arts of either `find -delete`, `xargs -p`, as well as generating scripts full of individual `rm` or other calls for review. Some simple "for f in bla*; do echo 'mv $f ${f##blub#blob}' >> script; done" is a powerful technique. And I don't think they will forget this anytime soon, without anyone getting angry or anything.
I'm mostly this chill about it because we have enough redundancy, automation and backups to let them run free and wild like this so they can learn quickly. Oh and yeah, they also learned how to reinit and/or rebuild database nodes, hah.
For the file removal problem, using a file system that supports (read-only) snapshots removes much of the pain. This can be done with zfs, btrfs, and the LVM subsystem can also do it with less advanced filesystems.
GNU find on rhel9 has explicit warnings about the -exec option:
"There are unavoidable security problems surrounding use of the -exec action; you should use the -execdir option instead."
"If you are using find in an environment where security is important (for example if you are using it to search directories that are writable by other users), you should read the `Security Considerations' chapter of the findutils documentation, which is called Finding Files and comes with findutils. That document also includes a lot more detail and discussion than this manual page, so you may find it a more useful source of information."
Well that's reductive and dismissive. These are perfectly understandable mistakes or scenarios one might find themselves and a simple method to avoid/rectify them.
Find is a very powerful and useful tool, and the author gave a clear example of when and where it might be useful. They also called out how to prevent accidents with `rm`.
Would it make you feel better if it had the title "Linux Horror Stories and Protection Spells (from the perspective of a spoiled Windows user)"? Does it really matter?
As far as I can tell they didn't mention windows at all, unless this author is notorious for something I'm not aware of. The only places windows turns up on that blog seems to be for instructions that also apply to windows.
Hubris, followed by Nemesis when you accidentally delete that important config file that causes an outage. What if and backups are always a good idea when deleting via shell
https://www.ecb.torontomu.ca/~elf/hack/recovery.html
https://www.toddheberlein.com/blog/2014/4/16/how-rm-rf-almos...