Well there was this guy from my hometown who shared his facebook password to strangers on parties. You never knew what would appear on his facebook account after weekends.
You could argue that's smart as long as you don't use Facebook to log in to anything else. He can say whatever he wants and now one can be sure it's him.
>Augmenting people is the same as replacing them.
>The person now has a greater output which means you need less of them.
Attention, i think this is a fallacy in multiple aspects.
Maybe they don't produce more, just higher quality?
On the other hand you have jobs where more is never enough, e.g. Scientists.
Higher quality is the same as higher production. That higher quality reduces the need for all sorts of people in QA roles.
Also, not all scientists are blue-sky researchers. Many do lab work, diagnose disease or provide services to patients. Others perform field tests or public outreach. Or they teach. Augmenting these people does replace people as fewer scientists are needed to perform a service once performed by many.
It depends on the tts plugin you use.
We have build and tested several tts plugins.
I can recommend Microsoft Bing Voice and the new Google Speech API. Both are very rarely wrong.
Used in production without a hassle for 2 years.
For our setup and scenario it was a very fitting and good solution. Easy Setup and easy usage. Recommended.