Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | CryptoBanker's comments login

> They didn't cover her chemo

How does that happen? AFAIK the ACA mandates coverage for cancer treatment for almost all plans.


I don’t know their situation but common tactics are to deny claims hoping that the patient will either die or find other funding options. This is an entire industry:

https://www.propublica.org/article/cigna-pxdx-medical-health...

https://www.propublica.org/article/evicore-health-insurance-...

This is one example of how hard it can be to fight these fraudulent denials, even for someone with above average resources:

https://www.propublica.org/article/priority-health-michigan-...

Individuals can’t fix these problems at scale: it needs something like a government investigator with subpoena power and the ability to directly fine executives. As long as people make more money by denying care, they’re just going to keep finding ways to do so.


The government can mandate anything it wants, if insurance companies are allowed to perpetrate mass fraudulent denials then it simply doesn't matter.

Just because it mandates coverage doesn't mean it mandates any treatment be provided in every case.

Certain expensive chemo drugs will get denied unless cheaper options are tried first, if they're used off-label or experimental. Some won't be approved until surgery, at too early a stage or if tests don't indicate elevated risk factors.


What you do is you deny it over and over and give a confused old woman the run-around until she's so exhausted she decides it's literally easier to die than to continue fighting. Ask me how I know.

The plan may cover it, but that doesn't mean the insurance company won't find a way to deny the claim.

In my experience they usually give a 48 or 72 hour period for the customer to respond before they take action on something like that.

They are exceptionally fast at detecting things like that though.


It does as of recently.

Demo doesn’t appear to be working

Same here. Rare use, but when I do it’s generally for a fairly major issue that would otherwise only be solved by some expensive specialty tool.


Doesn’t work if your work uses SSO like Okta


Very misleading title. Looks more like they were granted access to SORA


Do you have a source for that?


https://youtu.be/E9yZ0JusME4 and the CEO on Twitter are the main sources for Arc being in maintenance mode as they work on their new product.


This isn’t Reddit…


One of the devices was stored in a Faraday cage in airplane mode[1] - there's literally nothing to monitor

[1]https://appleinsider.com/articles/24/11/07/iphones-stored-fo...


> The affected devices even included one that was in Airplane Mode and another that was kept in a Faraday cage

> The officials hypothesize that an iPhone running iOS 18 can send signals that make nearby units reboot if the device has been kept disconnected from cellular networks.

Either the officials are storing multiple devices in 1 cage, don't understand Faraday cages, or are arguing in bad faith.

> In October of 2024, multiple users of iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max units reported that their devices kept restarting themselves for no apparent reason. This is a known issue that occurred during normal use and one that Apple fixed with the iOS 18.1 update.

> This timeframe would also align with the creation of the alleged law enforcement document. Specifically, the document says that three iPhones with iOS 18.0 were brought into a forensics lab on October 3, after which they rebooted themselves.

Ah ignorance or bad faith after all.


Faraday cages don't stop audio and we know [1] there are google/android devices that use ultrasound to communicate with other google/android devices.

It's not ENTIRELY far fetched, but it is very unlikely.

[1] https://www.wired.com/story/ultrasonic-signals-wild-west-of-...


I agree it is very unlikely. And I don't think you are proposing this is the case, but for the sake of argument. However, wouldn't it still be rather easy to verify? Faraday cage just helps with isolation and filters out the noise, so you can analyze a smaller set of data, in this case meaning you have to parse through less signals/data. But you would still be able to pinpoint this. If you can just monitor ultrasound, filter out what isn't easily explained/common (like background background radiation is to the universe).

To verify the original claim that it could happen over BLE, you don't need a faraday case to verify or prove this. The faraday cage just allows you to cut down on the data/signals to analyze.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: