Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Full disclosure here - attorney as well.

You absolutely raised some valid concerns. And I hope, I hope, I hope that startups aren't using these templates as-is (or possibly at all). Each company's business operations, policies, risk tolerance, etc. will be different and their standard contracts need to reflect those positions. They need to have lawyers write the agreements/policies/etc. to make sure they're following all applicable laws.

However, I think that Ironclad (and possibly others) are trying to make the administration of those contracts easier. Real trouble, from a business perspective, comes when the company gets bigger and they don't know the risk on their books because they can't manage their contracts.

I don't think these tools will cut out the lawyers, but instead help the companies manage their contracts and be able to better use us lawyers.




I'm all for anything that gets people to pay attention to legal obligations. I do agree that many lawyers are inefficient and could be helped by automated tools. But I know of many, such as MY lawyer, who are very reasonable.

I do see many companies who don't know how to use lawyers. They do things like ask outside counsels to attend on-site meetings in person. Or they lie, forcing the lawyer to do things five or six times based on new information they pull out each cycle.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: