Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

He was gazumped by a much shinier offer because he had nothing in writing.

He concluded that he needs to move faster on the big picture, rather than haggling the correct protocol for picking of nits.



That's not what I get from the story though.

I sense the founders used the VC as leverage. They had a closing dinner the night before and shook on it. The VC was reasonable to expect the paperwork to be finalised the next day.

YC changing their mind at the very next day sounds very convenient...


I imagine that everyone's recollections differ. I'd hate to speculate.

Edit: I seem to have touched a nerve, but I don't know what it is. Can someone explain what I said that caused annoyance? I have the usual embarrassing secret obsession with made up internet points.


I didn't downvote you...

But they way you worded it seems to suggest that the VC wasn't telling the truth. At this stage, he has the benefit of the doubt.


That seems reasonable. I've been in situations where people simply recall events differently, without any sense of intending to deceive.


This is a really important point that many people are strongly resistant to.

False memory is a thing and many people refuse to accept that it could happen to them.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-24286258

(There was a radio programme this week that demonstrated the process of giving someone a false memory. I would post a link but First Great Western (the train I'm on) blocks a bunch of BBC website.)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: