I think you're being reductionist in your interpretation of his point. His point is not that features are unimportant, but that some un-implemented features are equally as important as implemented features.
People pay for features, but they also pay for un-features. It's called simplicity, and it helps sell many Apple products, including the iPod.
People pay for features, but they also pay for un-features. It's called simplicity, and it helps sell many Apple products, including the iPod.