Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

So yes, Go language is DONE, period.

They don't, however people adopting Go and wanting generics shouldn't be tricked into thinking that Go developers are even considering generics , because they are not.

Wrong:

Generics may well be added at some point. [...] This remains an open issue.

https://golang.org/doc/faq#generics




If you understand one or two things about type theory then you know that generics cannot be added to GO. Go designers know it. They cannot add generics without breaking the language and they will not break the language.

When you have at least 3 core designers of that language saying on record that the language won't have new features, then you know what is written in that Faq ain't going to happen.

So let's not mislead people interested in Go into thinking that it will get generics, it will never have generics.


I think you need to justify that statement, what about type theory says that Go can't have generics?

As a follow-up, would the same logic have proved that Java 1.4 couldn't add generics?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: