Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I like the author’s remarks and philosophy about keeping JavaScript small, but I thought the opening was remarkably uncharitable. The specific person and the specific feature are quite irrelevant to the point he’s making here.

I am left with some admiration for his goals, but also a great deal of trepidation about ever suggesting anything or even talking about JavScript.next. Will I be the next one called out by name if I make the mistake of asking whether traits might be a good addition to JavaScript?




For what it's worth - the authors know each other from before and knowing both parties Mark did not intend to mean any offense.


I came back to note that Mark has subsequently clarified that he meant absolutely no slight against Kyle. He is a gentleman.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: