This is an interesting counterpoint to an article/thread from earlier today: "Wh...

ghostberry · on April 28, 2015

Evidence trumps theory. A theory can be as clever as you like, but if it disagrees with the evidence, the theory is wrong.

acqq · on April 28, 2015

And what is the actual evidence of the visible increase of cancer from EM radiation? Is there a real "signal" or a kind of "noise"?

I've also stumbled to this:

http://www.febsletters.org/article/S0014-5793%2800%2901822-6...

jfoutz · on April 28, 2015

Well, X-rays of course. There's a pretty strong case to be made that exposure to uv increases skin cancer rates.

I'm sure you mean the lower frequency stuff though, and yeah, that's probably pretty safe.

acqq · on April 28, 2015

Yes, of course, I mean all the waves on the infrared side of the light (those that we call "radio waves") not on the ultraviolet one. And I mean not including heating effects, which are already measured.

ChuckMcM · on April 28, 2015

http://www.skepticnorth.com/2010/11/levitt-and-lai-peddling-...

There are a lot of papers which have failed to reproduce these effects. Granted fractal antennas are weird in and of themselves but cellular ones fail to pass the sniff test.