Regarding the Third Party Doctrine, the fewer third parties with access to the information, the more sovereign over the data the remaining parties are. But I agree with you that ISPs and mobile carriers are other companies who intercept, profile, sell and partner away plaintext information - and indeed in the case of at least some mobile carriers encrypted communications too.
I agree with the assessment that this is an opt in feature. I have spoken about the reasons I won't be opting in. (In my opinion it is a very bad trade.)
Definitely agreed that many other parties have access to the data. I disagree that this is an argument to add another.
[By the way, thank you very much for taking the time to speak on HN about Flywheel from your position. :)]
I absolutely agree with your rationale for not wanting to opt in; we appreciate that this is a highly privacy-sensitive topic and one that users need to make up their own minds about.
Regarding the Third Party Doctrine, the fewer third parties with access to the information, the more sovereign over the data the remaining parties are. But I agree with you that ISPs and mobile carriers are other companies who intercept, profile, sell and partner away plaintext information - and indeed in the case of at least some mobile carriers encrypted communications too.
I agree with the assessment that this is an opt in feature. I have spoken about the reasons I won't be opting in. (In my opinion it is a very bad trade.)
Definitely agreed that many other parties have access to the data. I disagree that this is an argument to add another.
[By the way, thank you very much for taking the time to speak on HN about Flywheel from your position. :)]