They don't have to reveal where the data came from. You got crazy(read: anti-status quo) ideas and you're getting close to being able to implement them? .... NSA leaks info to your opponent(s) and/or media(loves destructive info already)... and suddenly your opponent comes by with it. In shock you go, "How did you get this info?!!!" Opponent says "...I have my sources..." Or the news doesn't even approach you; they just blast it online/TV and wreck you, the end. Journalists don't have to tell you how they got the info at all. Anonymously by mail, whatever.
NSA's collected data is perfectly (ab)usable without revealing its source and to believe it hasn't already happened numerous times is denial. There must be all kinds of unrevealed scandals they're sitting on and it's undeniable human nature that at the government level the knowledge of these scandals hasn't been used as leverage on people. I can't even accept NSA employees haven't numerously abused their access to spy on friends & family.
> .... NSA leaks info to your opponent(s) and/or media(loves destructive info already)... and suddenly your opponent comes by with it. In shock you go, "How did you get this info?!!!" Opponent says "...I have my sources..."
NSA's collected data is perfectly (ab)usable without revealing its source and to believe it hasn't already happened numerous times is denial. There must be all kinds of unrevealed scandals they're sitting on and it's undeniable human nature that at the government level the knowledge of these scandals hasn't been used as leverage on people. I can't even accept NSA employees haven't numerously abused their access to spy on friends & family.