Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

However a 6 month cycle allows you to gain a better idea of what it is like to be a full time employee at a company, not merely an intern.

I did several 6 month cycles, but most of the other interns I worked with at these companies were doing 4 month cycles (in fact, they were almost all from Waterloo. That experience has given me an immense respect for that school.)

With 4 month internships, many companies give you an "intern project" that you see through to completion. It tests not just your technical capabilities but also your ability to plan and manage a project yourself. Great experience, and a great way for a company to test your skills and abilities. 6 months is a bit long for a single project meant primarily for one person though, so they throw you into the standard drudgery of full-time employment. Less pleasant, less sterilized and organized, but much more realistic.

At least that is how it played out at the companies I worked for.

Unless you are from a wealthy family (or live in one of those fancy progressive nations where higher education is free), chances are you will need to figure out a way to leverage your experiences in university for money. I think that either a 6-month or 4-month cycle of internships/coops is one of the best ways to prepare yourself for this. There are pros and cons to either, but both are pretty great.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: