C++ isn't evolving; it's just accumulating features. That's a crucial difference. The amount of harmful patterns you can accidentally use just keep on strictly increasing.
MY "observation" is that your "observation" cannot be trusted because you're being "unfair" in your "characterization" of C++'s new features as being the negative phrase "accumulating features" rather than "evolving" despite the idea that "evolving" implies getting "new features".
