Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Why would you still be comfortable using an incompetent company's hardware, even if you fixed the software issue?

Does anyone do meticulous teardowns of routers, much less documenting what silicon is present?




Yes, typically home routers tend to use pretty industry standard chips like Broadcom chips (like the BCM5357 in my home router). D-Link, Linksys, and crew don't usually roll their own SoCs, but just seem to throw off the shelf stuff in there. These chips tend to be SoCs, and while I can't be totally sure that there isn't a weirdo NSA backdoor on it (probably just as likely as any other router, residential or commercial), most of the meat lives in the chip, and with good open source firmware (DD-WRT et al.) it's probably just about as reasonable as anything else coming and going. I certainly have far more faith in a regular off-the-shelf SoC + open source firmware tuned to my own needs (and believe or not thisn't hard at all) than anything with propriety firmware, including (and especially, to me) Apple. Maybe the next best thing to do is to build your own WiFi router from totally off the shelf parts (not so hard to get into a small form factor any more).

As to inspecting the SoC itself, that would be certainly interesting. Most of them are just ARM SoCs; this might make for an interesting blog post looking at the silicon.


ARM? I thought most routers used MIPS. At least several of the ones I've used are.


ARM is taking over from MIPS in the 802.11ac supporting products. MIPS is still around, but is now in the second tier of popularity alongside PPC. The single-core MIPS 24K and 74K that have been so popular just aren't fast enough for doing smart things at DOCSIS 3 speeds. They've also largely switched from NOR flash to NAND flash.


The OpenWRT wiki pages for the routers usually has some detailed info about the hardware. That won't tell you about hardware problems they might have that they didn't investigate but you can usually find photos of the boards to see what's there. [1][2][3]

[1] http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/tp-link/tl-mr3040#photos_v10 [2] http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/linksys/wrt610n#opening_the_case [3] http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/netgear/wndr3700#photos


https://wikidevi.com/ also has detailed information about what chips are used, often gathered from FCC filings. Atheros, Broadcom, etc. are a lot more trustworthy than D-Link and Netgear. Once you've identified a router as having an Atheros SoC and a firmware update format supported by OpenWRT, you really only need to worry about it having bad power supply and antennas.


I wouldn't exactly say comfortable, maybe more comfortable. Sometimes you have/need to make do with what you have.




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: