Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think it's a stretch to assume that the way a presidential candidate's campaign webmaster chooses to configure a website will be any indication of how the candidate would lead the executive branch of government. It's probably better to look at the candidate's previous leadership performance and his or her positions (as indicated by voting records, not campaign rhetoric) on policy issues.



I read the article as exactly that, manufacturing a reason why you'd be interested in the comparison, other than just curiosity.

I didn't read the author's suggestion as serious.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: