Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So the problem is that, at a certain growth point, growing the community and preserving the feel of the community become more or less mutually exclusive. New people will invariably bring their feel for things here, even if it displeases existing users.

Anything involving kharma or other metrics is also likely to fail, and will probably lead to lots of benign but likely popular posts so that people can get more "power".

Basically I think your options are to freeze the community (or make it invite only) or to be ok with the fact that trolls will start showing up and all we can do is ignore them. I don't particularly advocate either of these, but generally believe less extreme measures are superior.

There's a fine line between trolling and radical new ideas and sometimes radical new ideas are a good thing.



be ok with the fact that trolls will start showing up and all we can do is ignore them

No. If signal:noise gets too low, good people will leave.


The voting scheme should bring good to the top and send trolls to the bottom.


that's what people said about usenet. "just killfile the trolls." that didn't stop almost everybody from arguing with them.

usenet was designed in a more naive time, and it has zero defenses against disruptions. and that's why it died.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: