I am all for pacer reform, but I cannot see more than .05% of readers getting past the statues analogy around line 7, where this document has yet to even hint at the argument it is making. Also, lots of unexplained, unreadable, unrelated text at the top. It begins "IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR PUBLIC OPINION." Well, please think about what this means. It means, each time you make us read something like that before getting to the point you lose about half of the public, and this document does about 30 times over.