Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

A few weeks ago I argued that language distribution platforms should be based on a distributed version control system (like Mercurial or Git) and have an user-friendly web-interface (like BitBucket or GitHub). Reputation (like the one found in StacOverflow) should also be a part of the platform. Anyhow, read more here if you are interested: http://amix.dk/blog/viewEntry/19475



Nice post. I think this is a really cool idea in general. A few of us on one of my projects have been thinking myself recently about a package manager based on git, where you could literally merge in feature branches or patch branches as you wanted...


While a nice idea, it would be worth finding out why github abandoned this very concept in favor of gemcutter.org before diving in head first. I trust the github guys as being far more competent than most in all matters of distributed source control especially when it comes to package management.


The idea is sound, but it was a distraction for us, so we were more than happy to offload rubygems to a dedicated service that could give it the attention it deserves.


Presumably because gemcutter was doing a better job?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: