Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

For cross-datacenter replication you should be using a secured VPN anyway.



No, if your db can use SSL, then additional layer of complexity is not required.

upd.: don't get me wrong, Redis is my favorite DB, really. But better to be objective.


It's hard to imagine every service in your infrastructure implementing SSL would be more secure than a single VPN tool. You are very optimistic about the difficulties of getting security right.


It's really simple to imagine and I even have implemented it :) "One single VPN" may (and will) fail sometimes, so count your complexity and stability with and without one extra service.


I'm sorry to be skeptical, but when a random person on the internet claims to have implemented SSL more securely than open source tools that are completely built around security, I tend to not believe it.

Implementing SSL is easy. Implementing SSL correctly is very difficult, and you probably won't find out you did it wrong for a long time, if ever.


I'm not implementing SSL, I just use it. With MySQL you can just use it. With Redis you have to use VPN with all costs of VPN. Please calm down and stop forcing your preference of VPN as the only right way.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: