Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
jstanley
on March 25, 2015
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Proving false in Coq using an implementation bug
Any statement is either true or false. If we can prove that false is true, then any statement is true.
EDIT: For example: 1+1=3. That's false. We've learnt that false=true, therefore 1+1=3 is true.
heinrich5991
on March 25, 2015
[–]
I don't think it's that easy. Not every statement is either true or false in Coq, you'd need to accept the law of excluded middle for that.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
EDIT: For example: 1+1=3. That's false. We've learnt that false=true, therefore 1+1=3 is true.