> Static typing is like unit tests that take no maintenance.
Um, no. At best they are like a tiny fraction (and trivial fraction at that) of the unittests required. AND static typing often requires maintenance (as all code does) including initial burden of creating them in first place.
Um, no. At best they are like a tiny fraction (and trivial fraction at that) of the unittests required. AND static typing often requires maintenance (as all code does) including initial burden of creating them in first place.