Let's separate get-rich-quick from the actual process of making affiliate campaigns, testing and scaling them.
Here's some stats (top-level, very approximate) from my own experience:
* Number of campaigns created & stage 1 testing: 500+
* % to stage 2: ~25%
* % from stage 1 to 2: 20%
* % from stage 2 to "success": ~50%
In the end, I'd say that roughly 5% of my affiliate campaigns were successful. Success is defined as eventually returning the test budget * 4.
The key was that if I got a campaign to stage 2 I had a very high likelihood of profit. Literally 50% of the stage 2 campaigns became successes (most stage 2's broke even close to it).
Of those successful campaigns, only 10% of them generated 90% of my profits on average. The end result is that ~1% of all the campaigns I made made 90% of the profits, which is quite accurate.
Over the span of 7 years of being a full-time affiliate (excluding the part-time years) 12 campaigns were the main money drivers.
Here's some stats (top-level, very approximate) from my own experience:
* Number of campaigns created & stage 1 testing: 500+ * % to stage 2: ~25% * % from stage 1 to 2: 20% * % from stage 2 to "success": ~50%
In the end, I'd say that roughly 5% of my affiliate campaigns were successful. Success is defined as eventually returning the test budget * 4.
The key was that if I got a campaign to stage 2 I had a very high likelihood of profit. Literally 50% of the stage 2 campaigns became successes (most stage 2's broke even close to it).
Of those successful campaigns, only 10% of them generated 90% of my profits on average. The end result is that ~1% of all the campaigns I made made 90% of the profits, which is quite accurate.
Over the span of 7 years of being a full-time affiliate (excluding the part-time years) 12 campaigns were the main money drivers.