Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Would it cause more panic and economic instability than California having zero water next year, but at a great price?



I'm assuming the alternative that the grandparent is against is forced sharing, ie., regulation which would keep the situation from reaching that state where there is zero water next year. I don't think anyone supports CA doing nothing and to keep using water at the current rate.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: