Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

- Not-so-great documentation.

- Lengthy learning curve.

- Not concerned with performance at all (can be a nightmare on mobile devices with low RAM).

- Google's history of throwing away and/or deprecating projects, (see Angular v1).

- I still have yet to see a Google website using Angular in any large capacity.

- Ecosystem lock-in. It tries to do a LOT of stuff, and you generally need to be doing all these things the Angular Way™.




> I still have yet to see a Google website using Angular in any large capacity.

Angular is not intended for typical "websites". It's for replacing what would previously have been desktop CRUD applications. Google use it extensively for internal tooling.

It's also worth remembering that most public facing Google applications have been around for years, decades even. It would take a long time to replace one of these with Angular, even if there was a desire to do so.


> Not concerned with performance at all

I would strongly disagree. Watch this link to when Igor talks about Angular performance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHulaj5ZxbI&t=35m30s


> - Not concerned with performance

what are the performance issues with TS?


No, that's Angular that has the perf issues.


Oh, I see. NVM then.


I think this was a jab at Angular, not TS.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: